Nissan Federal District Court Decisions

Lux Global Auto Sales, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Filed: November 28, 2022 as 2:2021cv02157
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lux Global Auto Sales, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

ORDER signed by Senior Judge John A. Mendez on 11/28/2022 GRANTING the 15 Motion to Dismiss. CASE CLOSED. (Spichka, K.)

Swisher et al v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC et al

Filed: November 21, 2022 as 4:2021cv00795
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Defendant: Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Resolvion LLC, Allstar Recovery LLC
Plaintiff: Carrie Swisher, Scott Swisher
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Defendant Nissan's motion to transfer venue (doc. 30 ) for the reasons stated within. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 11/21/2022. (SRD)

Hopkins v. Carlock Nissan of Tupelo, Inc.

Filed: November 18, 2022 as 1:2021cv00189
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Defendant: Carlock Nissan of Tupelo, Inc.
Plaintiff: Joshua Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Employment

OPINION AND ORDER granting 48 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 11/18/2022. (jtm)

Henry Lima Pineda et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Filed: November 7, 2022 as 2:2022cv00239
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Henry Lima Pineda, Teresa Lima Vargas
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 36 . (see document for details) (hr)

Eyosiyas W. Tilahun v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Filed: November 7, 2022 as 2:2021cv09326
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff: Eyosiyas W. Tilahun
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 48 . (see document for details) (hr)

Enma Rebecca Imery v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Filed: November 4, 2022 as 8:2021cv02029
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff: Enma Rebecca Imery
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner re Stipulation for Protective Order 45 . (see document for details) (hr)

Felipe Rodriguez et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Filed: November 4, 2022 as 2:2021cv09669
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff: Felipe Aquino Rodriguez, Elida Ramos Marquez
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order 33 (dml)

Vision Works IP Corp. v. Nissan North American, Inc.

Filed: October 11, 2022 as 3:2022cv00301
Court: California Southern District Court
Defendant: Nissan North American, Inc.
Plaintiff: Vision Works IP Corp.
Nature of Suit: Patent

Order Granting Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19 ). If Plaintiff wishes to file an Amended Complaint, it must do so by 10/31/22. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 10/11/22. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)

In re Nissan North America, Inc. Litigation

Filed: September 30, 2022 as 3:2019cv00843
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Consolidated Plaintiff: David Turner, VAUGHN KERKORIAN
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc., Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff: Cathy Bashaw, Robert Garneau, Lisa Hendrickson, Rhonda Perry, Jane Reeves, Nancy Housell, Jeffrey Olkowski, Courtney Johnson, Scott Reeves
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

MEMORANDUM. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 9/30/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ln)

MD Auto Group, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Filed: September 20, 2022 as 1:2021cv01584
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc.
Plaintiff: MD Auto Group, LLC, MD Auto Group, LLC doing business as I-90 Nissan
Nature of Suit: Franchise

Order denying Plaintiff's request for an award of attorney fees. Related Docuement 35 . Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 9/20/2022. (S,SR)

Aram Terteryan v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

Filed: September 1, 2022 as 2:2016cv02029
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff: Aram Terteryan
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. This judgment applies to and binds the named plaintiffs, AramTerteryan, Tatyana Davtyan and Marine Davtyan, the defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC, formerly known and sued as Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation ("NMAC"), and the certified plaintiff settlement class. This action is dismissed with prejudice. However, the Court retains jurisdiction to interpret, implement,…

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: August 29, 2022 as 3:2019cv01021
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 8/29/2022. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)

MD Auto Group, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Filed: August 29, 2022 as 1:2021cv01584
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc.
Plaintiff: MD Auto Group, LLC, MD Auto Group, LLC doing business as I-90 Nissan
Nature of Suit: Franchise

Order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion to compel discovery (Related Doc # 24 ); denying Defendant's Cross Motion for protective order (Related Doc # 26 ); and denying as moot Plaintiff's Motion to strike (Related Doc # 31 ). Judge Charles Esque Fleming on 8/29/2022. (S,SR)

Marlin Smith et al v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation et al

Filed: August 16, 2022 as 5:2021cv02139
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Sentry Credit Inc., Experian Information Solutions Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC, Transunion, LLC, Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC, Sentry Credit, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Marlin Smith, Floria Smith
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi re Stipulation for Protective Order 56 . See Order for details. (es)

Rhodes v. Sterling Mccall Nissan et al

Filed: August 11, 2022 as 4:2021cv04221
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Defendant: Sterling Mccall Nissan, Efrain Portillo, Adel Altarie, Gregory Belton, Chartway Financial Services, LLC, Chartway Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff: Jada Monae Rhodes
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 29 Memorandum and Recommendations granting 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM as to Plaintiffs Fair Credit Reporting Act claim; the claims brought under 18 U.S.C. § 67; 1341, 1343, and 1951; the claim brought under 12 U.S.C. § 83; and the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) claim to the extent that Plaintiff seeks recission of the vehicle transaction. However, the motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs TILA claim…

Melissa Miller v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

Filed: April 29, 2022 as 8:2021cv00691
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff: Melissa Miller
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Action With Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (Doc. 41 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton as follow: NMAC is dismissed from this action with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); The Parties shall bea r their own fees and costs, including all attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with this action; and The Court shall retain jurisdiction for purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement entered into by the Parties.…

Lu v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC et al

Filed: April 27, 2022 as 1:2021cv09148
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC, Trans Union LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Yiming Lu
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be cons ummated within forty-five (45)days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties…

Munoz v. Nissan North America Inc.

Filed: April 25, 2022 as 5:2021cv09406
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America Inc.
Plaintiff: Jose DeJesus Munoz
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 4/25/2022. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2022)

Lohr v. Nissan North America, Inc et al

Filed: April 19, 2022 as 2:2016cv01023
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc, Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Plaintiff: Tamara Lohr
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability

ORDER granting and denying Plaintiffs' 138 152 158 165 199 Motions to Seal. Plaintiffs' Motions to Seal, Dkts. # 138 , # 152 , and # 199 , are GRANTED. The Motions at Dkt. # 158 and # 165 are DENIED. All filings at Dkts. # 140 , # 145 , # 154 , # 155 , # 201 , and # 202 are to remain under seal. Dkts. # 160 , # 167 , and # 168 are to be unsealed. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Heriberto Duran v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Filed: April 15, 2022 as 2:2022cv00457
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc., Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Plaintiff: Heriberto Duran
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re Stipulation for Protective Order. 14 The Court, having considered the Parties' Stipulated Protective Order, all the papers filed in connection and for good cause appearing, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation. (See document for details) (vmun)