Robert Hurst vs. Nissan North America, Inc.
Filed: March 22, 2016
State: Missouri
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: WD78665
DeMaria v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Filed: February 1, 2016
State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2015cv03321
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 2/1/2016. Mailed notice(gel, )
Five Towns Nissan, LLC v Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.
Filed: January 5, 2016
State: New York
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Citation: 2016 NY Slip Op 00016
Case Number: 16535 651164/13
Sims v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Filed: December 24, 2015
State: Ohio
Court: Tenth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2015-Ohio-5575
Case Number: 14AP-975
Sims v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Filed: December 22, 2015
State: Ohio
Court: Tenth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2015-Ohio-5367
Case Number: 15AP-19
Dimitrov et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
Filed: December 22, 2015
State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2015cv06332
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the aforementioned reasons, we grant Defendants motion to dismiss because we lack personal jurisdiction over Defendant. It is so ordered. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 12/22/2015.Mailed notice. (mgh, )
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Deltawing Project 56, LLC et al
Filed: December 1, 2015
State: Tennessee
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Case Number: 3:2015cv00663
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 12/1/15. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Clear Lake Nissan and Santander Consumer USA Appeal from 333rd District Court of Harris County
Filed: November 19, 2015
State: Texas
Court: First Court of Appeals
Case Number: 01-15-00645-CV
Alfred McGee v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corpo
Filed: November 12, 2015
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Case Number: 15-2112
Davenport v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Filed: October 22, 2015
State: Mississippi
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv00671
ORDER granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 10/22/2015. (EJ)
Christopher Shondale Stacey v. Nissan North America, Inc., et al
Filed: October 15, 2015
State: Tennessee
Court: Workers Compensation
Case Number: M2014-00796-SC-R3-WC
Employee was terminated as a result of a verbal altercation with an employee of a contractor at his employer s wellness center. He thereafter sought reconsideration of his three previous workers compensation claims. Employer asserted that Employee was not eligible for reconsideration because he was terminated for misconduct connected with his work. See Tenn. Code. Ann. 50-6-241(d)(1)(B)(iii)(b) (2014). The trial court found that Employer had not sustained its burden of proof that…
Stacey v. Nissan N.A., Inc.
Filed: October 15, 2015
State: Tennessee
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: M2014-00796-SC-R3-WC
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood
NISSAN MOTOR COMPANY, LTD, ET AL. V. AMANDA MADDOX
Filed: September 24, 2015
State: Kentucky
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 2013-SC-000685-DG
LARRY D. CLANTON v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC.
Filed: September 10, 2015
State: New Jersey
Court: Appellate Division (Unpublished)
Case Number: a1737-13
PER CURIAM This is a product liability case. It involves the crashworthiness of a 2003 Nissan Altima. The jury found that defendant Nissan1 failed to design a reasonably safe vehicle, and awarded plaintiff substantial compensatory damages. Nissan appeals, asserting various errors concerning discovery and evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, collateral source, and pre-judgment interest. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the court's dismissal of his punitive damages claim. Having reviewed…
Brown v. Dick Smith Nissan
Filed: August 5, 2015
State: South Carolina
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 27556
The Court reverses Brown v. Dick Smith Nissan, Inc., Op. No. 2012-UP-688 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Dec. 28, 2012), and reinstates the trial judge's decision that the motor vehicle dealer violated the South Carolina Dealers Act.
HUMBERTO MORALES vs Sutherlin Nissan and Sentry Claims
Filed: July 15, 2015
State: Florida
Court: First District Court of Appeal
Case Number: 14-5512
Henderson v. Nissan and Kia of Union City et al
Filed: July 10, 2015
State: Georgia
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2015cv00861
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE AS FRIVOLOUS pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 7/9/2015. (adg) Modified on 7/10/2015 (adg).
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Wayzata Nissan, LLC
Filed: July 2, 2015
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 14-2971
Murphy, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge and Melloy,Circuit Judge] Civil case - Civil Procedure. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing this declaratory judgment action after finding the issues would be better handled in the parties' pending state court action.
Nissan of N. Olmsted, L.L.C. v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.
Filed: June 30, 2015
State: Ohio
Court: Tenth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2015-Ohio-2663
Case Number: 14AP-903
RICHARD L. REYNOLDS v. ROBERT J. BORDELON III, ROBERT J. BORDELON JR., USAGENCIES CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AUTOMOBILE CLUB INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGE, AND/OR AUTO CLUB FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY D/B/A TRIPLE A INSURANCE, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INFINITY DIVISION OF NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., A LUXURY CAR DIVISION OF NISSAN MOTORS, INSURANCE AUTO AUCTIONS CORP., ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, DEF INSURANCE COMPANY AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY C/W STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF/AND LINDA DUPUY v. ROBERT BORDELON AND USAGENCIES CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Filed: June 30, 2015
State: Louisiana
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 2014-C-2362
We find the petition alleges sufficient facts to support a breach of contract cause of action. Thus, we reverse the judgment that granted the exception of no cause of action and remand to the trial court for consideration of the contract claim. We offer no opinion as to the ultimate success of this cause of action or to any defense thereto. REVERSED AND REMANDED. WEIMER, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons. CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
