U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: August 14, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken ADDRESSING MOTIONS TO SEAL (750) (765) (769) (777) (795) (798) (808) in case 4:10-cv-03724-CW; (449) (454) in case 4:10-cv-05254-CW (cwlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: August 7, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING PLAINTIFFS 754 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ASSERT CLAIMS AGAINST THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, INC. AND ORACLE CORPORATION AND GRANTING SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CORPORATIONS 731 MOTION TO DISMISS AND QUASH. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2013)
Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated v. Nvidia Corporation
Filed: July 30, 2013 as 3:2012cv06375
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO RESCHEDULE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Nvidia Corporation, Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 30, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: July 9, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO PROVIDE CERTAIN MATERIAL TO THE TECHNICAL ADVISOR. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/9/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: June 19, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 801 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Matthew R. Rodgers. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: June 10, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER CHANGING TIME ON PLAINTIFFS 793 RULE 56(D) MOTION. Reset Deadlines/Hearing: Responses due by 6/20/2013; Replies due by 6/24/2013; Motion Hearing set for 6/27/2013 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/10/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2013)
Power Management Solutions LLC v. Nvidia Corporation
Filed: May 30, 2013 as 1:2012cv00427
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Power Management Solutions LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER (see Order for construction of terms). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/30/2013. (nms)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: May 30, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 775 Stipulation to change time to respond to re 766 MOTION for Summary Judgment Concerning Marking and Nominal Damages. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: May 17, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE INTERVERNOR NVIDIA CORPORATIONS ( 755 in 4:10-cv-03724-CW) MOTION TO SEAL AND ADDRESSING DEFENDANTS AND INTERVENORS (Docket Nos. 756 in 10-3724 and 442 in 10-5254) MOTION TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/17/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: May 14, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 751 Stipulation Changing Time to Respond re 735 Amended Complaint, Third Party Complaint. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: May 2, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re 730 Joint Discovery Letter Brief, filed by Hewlett Packard Co. & U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/2/2013. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2013)
Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. et al
Filed: April 29, 2013 as 6:2011cv00173
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Interphase Corporation, NVIDIA Corporation
Plaintiff: Mosaid Technologies Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The above-cited claim terms of the patents-in-suit shall be construed in accordance with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 04/29/13. (mll, )
Metabyte, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation et al
Filed: April 22, 2013 as 4:2012cv00044
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation, Andrei Osnovich, Michael Yaroslavtsev, David Cook, Viatcheslav Gostrenko, Mikhail Krivega
Plaintiff: Metabyte, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 45 Motion to Dismiss.(sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013)
BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: March 30, 2013 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Recovery of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses Incurred After Claim Construction 981 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants are entitled to an award of fees and costs incurred between June 23, 2011 and March 26, 2012, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, in an amount to be determined in a subsequent order. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/30/13.(pabsec)
Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated v. Nvidia Corporation
Filed: January 25, 2013 as 3:2012cv06375
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated
Nature of Suit: Patent
JUDGE ILLSTON'S STANDING ORDER (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: November 5, 2012 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE AND ORDER THEREON. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 5, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2012)
Granfield v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: August 27, 2012 as 3:2011cv05403
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Monica Granfield
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
ORDER Dismissing Case (jwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2012)
Granfield v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: August 2, 2012 as 3:2011cv05403
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Monica Granfield
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING AMENDED COMPLAINT re 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Monica Granfield. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on August 2, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
HSM Portfolio LLC et al v. Fujitsu Limited et al
Filed: July 3, 2012 as 1:2011cv00770
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu America Inc., Fujitsu Semiconductor America Inc., Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Qualcomm Inc, Elpida Memory Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc., Marvell Technology Group Ltd., Marvell Semiconductor Ltd., Micron Technology Inc., Nvidia Corporation, Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Promos Technologies Inc., Sandisk Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, STMicroelectronics, N.V., STMicroelectronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Cirrus Logic, Inc., ON Semiconductor Corporation, Xilinx Inc., Zoran Corporation
Plaintiff: HSM Portfolio LLC, Technology Properties Limited LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting 45 Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and Denying in part 52 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 70 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 100 Motion to Dismiss; Granting 122 Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and Denying in part [ 139]; Administratively closing with leave to renew 140 Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and Denying in part 174 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted Leave to Amend its complaint no later than 7/17/2012 (see Memorandum Order for…
Granfield v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: April 24, 2012 as 3:2011cv05403
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Monica Granfield
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
STIPULATION AND ORDER, Motions terminated: 49 Plaintiffs deadline for filing its response to NVIDIAs Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to May 11, 2012, and that NVIDIAs deadline for filing its reply in support of its Motion shall be extended to May 25, 2012.. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/24/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2012)
