-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: January 5, 2011 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 500 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel NVIDIA to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Witnesses. The discovery ordered herein shall be completed on or before 2/4/2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/5/2011. (mehcd)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: January 5, 2011 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ACTING CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO FOR DETERMINATION OFAPPROPRIATE REASSIGNMENT. The Court refers this matter to Acting Chief Magistrate Judge Spero for determination of appropriate reassignment of this case to another magist rate judge to: (1) resolve the pending 456 Motion ; and (2) for permanent assignment to resolve all future discovery disputes in accordance with the Civil Local Rules of Court. Once Judge Spero makes his determination, the moving party…
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: January 3, 2011 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on January 3, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2011)
-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: December 28, 2010 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER denying 566 Plaintiff's request for expedited briefing of its Motion to Compel.... The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Defendant NVIDIA shall respond on or before January 11, 2011. Plaintiff may reply on or before January 21, 2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/28/2010. (mehcd)
Rambus, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation
Filed: December 22, 2010 as 3:2010cv05448
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Miscellaneous: Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Mediatek Inc.
Plaintiff: Rambus, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/22/10. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2010)
-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: December 10, 2010 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 535 Plaintiff's Motion Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Expert Deadlines, and denying as moot 547 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Consideration of its Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Ext end Expert Deadlines. Fact discovery remains set for 1/11/2011. Initial expert disclosures due by 2/11/2011. Rebuttal expert disclosures due 3/11/2011. Expert discovery due by 4/11/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 4/11/2011. Final…
Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation
Filed: December 9, 2010 as 3:2008cv03343
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Rambus Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re: stipulation #165 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2010)
Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation
Filed: December 9, 2010 as 3:2008cv03343
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Rambus Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re: stipulation at #167 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2010)
Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation
Filed: December 8, 2010 as 3:2008cv03343
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Nvidia Corporation
Plaintiff: Rambus Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting extension to oppose administrative motion to relate cases re 170 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2010) Modified on 12/9/2010 (ys, COURT STAFF).
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: December 7, 2010 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on December 13, 2010. In light of the parties' pending Motions, the Court finds that a Case Management Conference would be premature at this time. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the December 13 Conference. The Court will set a new Case Management Conference date in its Order addressing the parties' Motions. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/7/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on…
-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: November 23, 2010 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 520 NVIDIA's Motion for Protective Order. Also, Plaintiff shall file a reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel NVIDIA to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witness [Doc. #500 (sealed #499)]on or be fore November 30, 2010, setting forth each area of testimony relevant to its infringement allegations in the two categories of "architecture" and "code" that it believes is deficient. NVIDIA may file a surreply on or…
-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: November 23, 2010 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting in part and denying without prejudice in part 383 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Sony to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witness; and granting in part and denying in part 457 Defendant Sony's Motion for Clarification by the Magistrate Judge of September 21, 2010 Order. Fact discovery is extended up to and including 1/11/2010 for the sole purpose of the discovery ordered herein. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/23/2010. (mehcd)
-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: November 22, 2010 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 11/22/2010, taking under advisement 383 Plaintiff's to Compel Sony to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witnes ses, 457 Sony's Motion for Clarification by the Magistrate Judge of the September 21, 2010 Order, and 500 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Nvidia to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witnesses. (FTR: C. Coomes -…
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: November 12, 2010 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON INTERVENORS' AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SEVER re 453 Administrative Motion to Schedule Hearing and Briefing Schedule on Intervenors' and Defendants' Motion to Sever. Set/Reset Dea dlines: Responses due by 11/16/2010. Replies due by 11/18/2010. Motion Hearing set for 11/29/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Motions terminated: 453 MOTION for Hearing Administrative Motion to Schedule Hearing and…
FuzzySharp Technologies Incorporated v. Nvidia Corporation et al
Filed: November 4, 2010 as 5:2010cv01844
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dell Inc., Matrox Graphics Inc., Nvidia Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Dismissal without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) re 84 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/4/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2010)
FuzzySharp Technologies Incorporated v. Nvidia Corporation et al
Filed: November 4, 2010 as 5:2010cv01844
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dell Inc., Matrox Graphics Inc., Nvidia Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: Fuzzysharp Technologies Incorporated
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING 83 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. The Clerk shall close this file. Motions terminated: 40 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/4/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2010) Modified text on 11/4/2010 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: October 28, 2010 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER granting 451 Sony's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply Responding to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Sony to Produce for Deposition Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witnesses. Sony Defendants may file a surreply on or before 11/2/2010. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/28/2010. (mehcd)
-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: October 28, 2010 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER denying 335 Defendants' Motion for Clarification of Claim Constructions to Incorporate Statement Made in the Claim Construction Order, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/28/10.(ebs, )
In re Nvidia Corporation Securities Litigation
Filed: October 19, 2010 as 5:2008cv04260
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Jen-Hsun Hunag, Marvin D. Burkett, Nvidia Corp.
Plaintiff: Lisa Miller
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER RE: 149 GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/19/10.(rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)
-MEH BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: October 14, 2010 as 1:2009cv01257
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: NVIDIA Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 362 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel NVIDIA to produce Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Witnesses, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/14/2010. (mehcd)
