Davenport et al v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: February 28, 2024
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 5:2023cv01877
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Judge P. Casey Pitts on 2/28/2024. (nmc, COURT USER) (Filed on 2/28/2024)
E. OHMAN J:OR FONDER AB, ET AL V. NVIDIA CORPORATION, ET AL
Filed: August 25, 2023
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 21-15604
Securities Fraud. The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s dismissal of a securities fraud action brought under §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 against NVIDIA Corp. and three of its officers.Plaintiffs alleged that NVIDIA, a producer of graphics processing units, knowingly or recklessly made materially misleading and false statements regarding the impact of cryptocurrency sales on NVIDIA’s…
ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. NVIDIA CORPORATION
Filed: March 22, 2023
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 22-1112
Attia v. Nvidia Corp. et al
Filed: April 6, 2021
State: Mississippi
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv00343
FINAL JUDGMENT: that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 4/6/2021 (PKS)
MATTHEW LEBOEUF V. NVIDIA CORPORATION
Filed: January 14, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 19-17481
VISUAL MEMORY LLC v. NVIDIA CORPORATION
Filed: August 15, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-2254
COFFELT v. NVIDIA CORPORATION
Filed: March 15, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 17-1119
Visual Memory LLC v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: May 27, 2016
State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2015cv00789
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 24 ). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/27/2016. (nms)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: March 14, 2016
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv00757
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 03/14/2016. (tjoh, )
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: February 29, 2016
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv00757
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/29/2016. (ccol, )
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: February 24, 2016
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv00757
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/23/2016. (tjoh, )
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. NVIDIA Corporation
Filed: January 28, 2016
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv00757
MEMORANDUM OPINION - This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANTS' MOTION TOSUPPLEMENT DEFENDANTS' WITNESS LIST 677 . For theforegoing reasons, the motion has been denied (see ORDER, 692 ). SEE OPINION FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 01/27/2016. (tjoh, )
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: December 16, 2015
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv00757
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/16/2015. Memorandum Opinion electronically sent to all counsel of record. (sbea, )
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: July 30, 2015
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv00757
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 07/30/2015. (tjoh, )
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Filed: April 3, 2015
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv00757
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 04/03/2015. (tjoh, )
BIAX CORPORATION v. NVIDIA CORPORATION
Filed: February 24, 2015
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 13-1649
WILLIAM BRANDT V. NVIDIA CORPORATION
Filed: November 6, 2014
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 11-15189
ROBERTO COHEN V. NVIDIA CORP.
Filed: October 2, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 11-17708
Plaintiffs, purchasers of NVIDIA's stock, filed suit alleging that the company violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and corresponding SEC Rule 10b-5, 15 U.S.C. 78j(b), 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-5. The district court dismissed plaintiffs' amended complaint because they failed to adequately allege scienter. The court held that Item 303 of Regulation S-K did not create a duty to disclose for purposes of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. Such a duty to disclose must be…
