Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 23, 2015 as 3:2015cv00156
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
ORDER GRANTING 36 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/23/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2015)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 30, 2015 as 3:2015cv00156
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
ORDER GRANTING 29 STIPULATION Selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/30/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2015)
Oplink Communications Inc et al v. Finisar Corporation
Filed: January 11, 2012 as 3:2011cv02361
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Finisar Corporation
Plaintiff: Oplink Communications Inc, Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 31 Stipulation filed by Finisar Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: January 6, 2012 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 76 OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/6/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: December 14, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 74 TO AMDEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. Claim Construction Hearing set for 2/24/2012 10:00 AM. Tutorial Hearing set for 2/22/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/14/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: December 1, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 to amend claim construction schedule. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/1/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: November 28, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
NOTICE OF REFERRAL AND ORDER re: discovery procedures. The court denies without prejudice 68 Plaintiff's motion for a protective order and vacates the current 12/29/2011 hearing date. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order) (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)
Oplink Communications Inc et al v. Finisar Corporation
Filed: November 3, 2011 as 3:2011cv02361
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Finisar Corporation
Plaintiff: Oplink Communications Inc, Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RESETTING CMC Case Management Conference set for 12/16/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/3/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: October 25, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/25/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)
In Re: IPO Securities Lit., et al v. , et al
Filed: August 25, 2011 as 1:2021mc00092
Court: New York Southern District Court
Appellant: James J. Hayes
Consolidated Defendant: First Union Securities, Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff: Diane C. Collins, Eva Marie Roberto, Frederick B. Henderson, Harlan R. Getman, J. Chris Rowe, James E. Collins, Jeorges Levy, John G. Miles, Lisa Frye, Stathis Pappas
Defendant: 724 Solutions, A. Brooke Seawell, A. Michael Spence, Abbott Brown, ABN Amro Securities LLC, Abraham Kleinfield, Accelerated Networks, Inc., Aclara Biosciences, Inc., Adams, Harkness & Hill, Inc., Addison M. Fischer, Aether Systems, Inc., Aetna, Inc., Agency.com Ltd., Agile Software Corporation, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Ahmass L. Fakahany, Airnet Communications Corporation, Airspan Networks, Inc., Ajay Sabherwal, Akamai Technologies, Inc., Alain Rossman, Alamosa PCS Holdings, Inc., Alan Black, Alan Citro, Alan Hald, Alan Hansen, Alan G. Breitman, Alan J. Hirschfield, Alan P. Naumann, Albert Lee Thurburn, Albert M. Avery, IV, Albert T. Dosser
and others
Miscellaneous: James Carreker, Mauro Lusardi
Movant: A.C Agrawal, A.D. Davis, Jr., Aashka Mehta, Abdul Husrieh, Abe Naymark, Achut Chukka, Adam Paskanik, Adele Romano, Adil Dastur, Ahad Diba, Aharon Golub, Ahemd Al Issa, Ahmed K. Tariq, Aileen Haw, Ajit Gandhi, Al Monjazeb, Alan Carlson, Alan Feenstra, Alan Karahalis, Alan McKnight, Alan Peck, Alan Rosengarten, Alan Suen, Alan B. Daroff, Alan C. Kettelkamp, Alan Wuu-Cheng Ling, Albert Berger, Albert Tacornal, Albert J. Von Holt, Aldwyn Allsopp-Bey, Alejandro Ludlow, Aleksandr Ivanov
and others
Objector: D&S Parnership #2, Ernest J. Browne, James J. Mary, JKM Company, Lester Baum, Mark Merrill, Richard Paul Warren, Ronald Ady, Susan Browne, Vondell Tyler
Plaintiff: 1401 Ocean Avenue LLC, A. John Price, A. Pher Holmberg, Aaron Brody, Abraham Eisen, Abraham Garfinkel, Abraham Kassin, Abraham Neiger, Abraham Slomovics, Abraham S. Kassin, Adam Peter Stone, Adele Brody, Adrian Chin, AFA Management Partners, L.P., Al Cavallaro, Al Daughtry, Alan Shapiro, Alan J. Spitz, Albert Brody, Albert Schechter, Albert Benjamin Lewis, Alex Shainsky, Alexander Kouprievitch, Alexander Makaron, Alfonso L. Tiu, Alhan Evrim, Aliza Brody, Allen Sumner, Alo Ghosh, Aman Kermaninejad, Amita Singhal, Andrea Jones
and others
Special Master: Michael Kennedy
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, the Second Circuit directed this Court to determine whether pro se objector Hayes is a class member. For all of the reasons that are set forth in this Order, I hold that Hayes is not a class member. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/25/11) (pl)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: August 25, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER the court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related and no reassignments shall occur. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/25/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)
Oplink Communications Inc et al v. Finisar Corporation
Filed: August 25, 2011 as 3:2011cv02361
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Finisar Corporation
Plaintiff: Oplink Communications Inc, Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER the court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related and no reassignments shall occur. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/25/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2011)
Oplink Communications Inc et al v. Finisar Corporation
Filed: August 16, 2011 as 3:2011cv02361
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Finisar Corporation
Plaintiff: Oplink Communications Inc, Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Re 7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: August 2, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
AMENDED JOINT SCHEDULE AND ORDER RE 53 . Claims Construction Hearing set for 1/20/2012 09:00 AM. Tutorial Hearing set for 1/18/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/2/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: July 22, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/22/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2011)
Oplink Communications Inc et al v. Finisar Corporation
Filed: June 8, 2011 as 3:2011cv02361
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Finisar Corporation
Plaintiff: Oplink Communications Inc, Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STANDING ORDERS (mjj2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: June 8, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION. This matter is hereby transferred to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Any existing scheduling deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/8/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: June 8, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION. This matter is hereby transferred to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Any existing scheduling deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/8/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: June 6, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Deadline Disclosures re 41 Stipulation. The date for the parties to exchange Patent Local Rule 4-2 disclosures shall be extended to June 10, 2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/6/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: May 25, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request for Extending Mediation Deadline re 39 Stipulation. Mediation deadline set for 10/31/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/25/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
