MORSELL v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Filed: August 30, 2024
State: District of Columbia
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Case Number: 1:2012cv00800
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 377 Defendant's Motion to Amend and Supplement the Court's Amended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; and denying 381 the United States' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/30/2024. (lcrc1)
MORSELL v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Filed: January 16, 2024
State: District of Columbia
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Case Number: 1:2012cv00800
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 364 the United States' Motion to Amend and Supplement the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; and denying 365 California's Motion to Amend and Supplement the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/16/2024. (lcrc1)
Felix v. Symantec Corporation et al
Filed: February 10, 2022
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv02902
ORDER GRANTING 413 MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT AND 414 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES Signed by Judge William Alsup. (whalc5, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2022)
MORSELL v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Filed: January 31, 2022
State: District of Columbia
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Case Number: 1:2012cv00800
MEMORANDUM OPINION: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 280 the United States' Motion in Limine and DENYING 283 Norton's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/31/2022. (lcrc2)
MORSELL v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Filed: August 3, 2021
State: District of Columbia
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Case Number: 1:2012cv00800
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 200 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/2/2021. (lcrc3)
Felix v. Symantec Corporation et al
Filed: May 8, 2020
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv02902
ORDER GRANTING 197 MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; DENYING 221 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY. By Judge Alsup. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2020)
MORSELL v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Filed: March 30, 2020
State: District of Columbia
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Case Number: 1:2012cv00800
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 124 Defendant's Motion to Strike Expert Testimony; granting in part and denying in part 105 the United States' Motion to Exclude Persons Designated to Provide Expert Testimony; and granting 118 Defendant's Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record in Support of its Opposition to the United States' Motion to Exclude. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/30/2020. (lcrc2)
Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Symantec Corporation
Filed: November 19, 2019
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv00808
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/19/2019. (walk, )
Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Symantec Corporation
Filed: July 2, 2019
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv00808
MEMORANDUM OPINION "The Inter Partes Review Opinion" Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on July 2, 2019. (jtho, )
Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Symantec Corporation
Filed: July 2, 2019
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv00808
MEMORANDUM OPINION "The Markman Opinion" Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on July 2, 2019. (jtho, )
Beaumont v. Symantec Corp.
Filed: April 15, 2019
State: Ohio
Court: Eleventh District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2019-Ohio-1418
Case Number: 2018-G-0172
Symantec Corporation v. Zscaler, Inc.
Filed: July 23, 2018
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2017cv04426
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 193 Motion for Leave to File. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2018)
Symantec Corporation v. Zscaler, Inc.
Filed: July 23, 2018
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2017cv04426
ORDER DENYING JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 190 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2018)
Symantec Corporation v. Zscaler, Inc.
Filed: March 23, 2018
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2017cv04426
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 149 Motion to Dismiss; granting 155 Motion to Strike. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2018)
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC v. SYMANTEC CORP.
Filed: March 15, 2018
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 17-1814
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Filed: March 13, 2018
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-2551
Greenblatt v. Symantec Corp.
Filed: August 30, 2017
State: Oregon
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: A158080
Erin Caligiuri v. Symantec Corp.
Filed: April 28, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 16-2113
Gruender, Author, with Murphy and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Class Actions. In class action alleging defendant failed to disclose free alternatives to re-download Norton ant-virus software, the district court approved a settlement for the consumer class under which defendant would pay $60 million into the total settlement fund; the district court did not have to wait for a final accounting of administrative costs before approving the settlement and it did not err in approving…
Erin Caligiuri v. Symantec Corp.
Filed: April 28, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 16-2015
Gruender, Author, with Murphy and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Class Actions. In class action alleging defendant failed to disclose free alternatives to re-download Norton ant-virus software, the district court approved a settlement for the consumer class under which defendant would pay $60 million into the total settlement fund; the district court did not have to wait for a final accounting of administrative costs before approving the settlement and it did not err in approving…
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC v. SYMANTEC CORP.
Filed: September 30, 2016
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1769
