TiVo Federal District Court Decisions

Eric Godtland Management, Inc. v. TiVo Corporation

Filed: March 31, 2020 as 1:2019cv10525
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Corporation
Plaintiff: Eric Godtland Management, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER: By letter dated March 30, 2020, the parties have informed the Court that this case has settled. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action be conditionally discontinued without prejudice and without costs; provided, however , that within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, the parties may submit to the Court their own Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal. Otherwise, within such time Plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to…

Digital CBT LLC v. TiVo Inc

Filed: November 27, 2013 as 2:2012cv06418
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc
Plaintiff: Digital CBT LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block granting Stipulation for Protective Order 32 . (nbo)

Motorola Mobility, Inc. et al v. TiVo Inc.

Filed: May 23, 2013 as 5:2013mc80015
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Miscellaneous: Google Inc.
Plaintiff: General Instrument Corporation, Motorola Mobility, Inc.

ORDER SETTING HEARING re 1 MOTION to Compel Google to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena filed by TiVo Inc.. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 23, 2013. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2013)

Motorola Mobility, Inc. et al v. TiVo Inc.

Filed: April 23, 2013 as 5:2013mc80015
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Miscellaneous: Google Inc.
Plaintiff: General Instrument Corporation, Motorola Mobility, Inc.

ORDER SOLICITING RESPONSE FROM TIVO INC. re 8 MOTION to Set a Hearing For a Protective Order filed by Technicolor SA. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 23, 2013. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. TiVo Inc.

Filed: August 10, 2012 as 3:2012cv02766
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/10/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)

TiVo Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filed: July 18, 2012 as 2:2012cv00311
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: TiVo Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/18/12. Time Warner Cable will be added as a party to this case per law clark.(bas)

Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc

Filed: March 23, 2012 as 5:2011cv02896
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 44 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2012)

Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc

Filed: November 22, 2011 as 5:2011cv02896
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/22/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)

Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc

Filed: May 19, 2011 as 5:2011cv02896
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER granting dft's 21 Motion to stay and to transfer venue to Northern District of CA by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) (Entered: 05/19/2011)

Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc

Filed: May 19, 2011 as 2:2011cv00134
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: TIVO Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER granting dft's 21 Motion to stay and to transfer venue to Northern District of CA by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS)

Microsoft Corporation v. TIVO Inc

Filed: February 18, 2011 as 2:2011cv00134
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: TIVO Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER granting 10 Stipulated Motion re answer to complaint by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) (Entered: 02/18/2011)

Igbinadolor v. Tivo Inc. et al

Filed: October 6, 2009 as 1:2008cv02580
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Defendant: Clarion Corporation of America, JVC America, Philips Magnavox/Philips Electronics, Sony Corporation, TiVo, Inc.
Plaintiff: Phillip Igbinadolor
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 10/6/2009. (gar)

Dish Network Corporation et al v. TiVo Inc.

Filed: May 28, 2009 as 1:2008cv00327
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff: Dish Network Corporation, Dish Network LLC, Echosphere LLC, Echostar DBS Corporation, Echostar Technologies LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM ORDER Transferring this case to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 5/28/2009. (nms)

Dish Network Corporation et al v. TiVo Inc.

Filed: March 31, 2009 as 2:2009cv00171
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff: Dish Network Corporation, Dish Network LLC, Echosphere LLC, Echostar DBS Corporation, Echostar Technologies LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION re 12 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Rule 12(b). Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 3/31/2009. (nms) [Transferred from Delaware on 5/28/2009.]

Dish Network Corporation et al v. TiVo Inc.

Filed: March 31, 2009 as 1:2008cv00327
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff: Dish Network Corporation, Dish Network LLC, Echosphere LLC, Echostar DBS Corporation, Echostar Technologies LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION re 12 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Rule 12(b). Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 3/31/2009. (nms)

Igbinadolor v. Tivo Inc. et al

Filed: November 14, 2008 as 1:2008cv02580
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Defendant: Clarion Corporation of America, JVC America, Philips Magnavox/Philips Electronics, Sony Corporation, TiVo, Inc.
Plaintiff: Phillip Igbinadolor
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DISMISSING as frivolous Plaintiff's claims alleging infringement of United States Patent Office reissue application 11/396,224 and infringement of foreign patents and/or patent applications. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants aris ing out of the '196 Patent and '884 Patent, those claims shall be allowed to proceed. Plaintiff is directed to complete service forms and return to Clerk within 20 days. Upon receipt of forms, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare a…

Igbinadolor v. Tivo Inc. et al

Filed: November 14, 2008 as 1:2008cv02580
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Defendant: Clarion Corporation of America, JVC America, Philips Magnavox/Philips Electronics, Sony Corporation, TiVo, Inc.
Plaintiff: Phillip Igbinadolor
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER, directing Plaintiff to complete service forms and return to Clerk within 20 days. (Forms sent to party: USM 285, Summons, Initial Disclosures.) Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/14/2008. (sjk)