Toyota Federal Appellate Court Decisions

HELENE CAHEN V. TOYOTA MOTOR CORP.

Filed: December 21, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 16-15496

Richard Rosenbaum v. Toyota Motor Sales

Filed: September 12, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Case Number: 16-2769

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: August 11, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2507

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In products liability claiming plaintiffs were injured through unintended acceleration of plaintiff Lee's Toyota Camry, the jury found Lee was 40% responsible for the collision and assessed Toyota's fault at 60%. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of "other similar incidents" of unintended acceleration as the circumstances surrounding each incident and this incident…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: August 11, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2511

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In products liability claiming plaintiffs were injured through unintended acceleration of plaintiff Lee's Toyota Camry, the jury found Lee was 40% responsible for the collision and assessed Toyota's fault at 60%. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of "other similar incidents" of unintended acceleration as the circumstances surrounding each incident and this incident…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: August 11, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2516

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In products liability claiming plaintiffs were injured through unintended acceleration of plaintiff Lee's Toyota Camry, the jury found Lee was 40% responsible for the collision and assessed Toyota's fault at 60%. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of "other similar incidents" of unintended acceleration as the circumstances surrounding each incident and this incident…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: August 11, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2635

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In products liability claiming plaintiffs were injured through unintended acceleration of plaintiff Lee's Toyota Camry, the jury found Lee was 40% responsible for the collision and assessed Toyota's fault at 60%. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of "other similar incidents" of unintended acceleration as the circumstances surrounding each incident and this incident…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: August 11, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2636

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In products liability claiming plaintiffs were injured through unintended acceleration of plaintiff Lee's Toyota Camry, the jury found Lee was 40% responsible for the collision and assessed Toyota's fault at 60%. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of "other similar incidents" of unintended acceleration as the circumstances surrounding each incident and this incident…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: August 11, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2637

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In products liability claiming plaintiffs were injured through unintended acceleration of plaintiff Lee's Toyota Camry, the jury found Lee was 40% responsible for the collision and assessed Toyota's fault at 60%. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of "other similar incidents" of unintended acceleration as the circumstances surrounding each incident and this incident…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: August 11, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2638

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In products liability claiming plaintiffs were injured through unintended acceleration of plaintiff Lee's Toyota Camry, the jury found Lee was 40% responsible for the collision and assessed Toyota's fault at 60%. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of "other similar incidents" of unintended acceleration as the circumstances surrounding each incident and this incident…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: June 9, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2507

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products Liability. In action involving unintended acceleration in Toyota Camrys, the district court carefully weighed the admission of other similar incident evidence and did not abuse its discretion in admitting a limited number of substantially similar incidents; argument that the district court erred in allowing plaintiffs' expert to give his opinion regarding the cause of the unintended acceleration rejected as this…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: June 9, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2511

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products Liability. In action involving unintended acceleration in Toyota Camrys, the district court carefully weighed the admission of other similar incident evidence and did not abuse its discretion in admitting a limited number of substantially similar incidents; argument that the district court erred in allowing plaintiffs' expert to give his opinion regarding the cause of the unintended acceleration rejected as this…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: June 9, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2636

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products Liability. In action involving unintended acceleration in Toyota Camrys, the district court carefully weighed the admission of other similar incident evidence and did not abuse its discretion in admitting a limited number of substantially similar incidents; argument that the district court erred in allowing plaintiffs' expert to give his opinion regarding the cause of the unintended acceleration rejected as this…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: June 9, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2637

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products Liability. In action involving unintended acceleration in Toyota Camrys, the district court carefully weighed the admission of other similar incident evidence and did not abuse its discretion in admitting a limited number of substantially similar incidents; argument that the district court erred in allowing plaintiffs' expert to give his opinion regarding the cause of the unintended acceleration rejected as this…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: June 9, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2516

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products Liability. In action involving unintended acceleration in Toyota Camrys, the district court carefully weighed the admission of other similar incident evidence and did not abuse its discretion in admitting a limited number of substantially similar incidents; argument that the district court erred in allowing plaintiffs' expert to give his opinion regarding the cause of the unintended acceleration rejected as this…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: June 9, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2638

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products Liability. In action involving unintended acceleration in Toyota Camrys, the district court carefully weighed the admission of other similar incident evidence and did not abuse its discretion in admitting a limited number of substantially similar incidents; argument that the district court erred in allowing plaintiffs' expert to give his opinion regarding the cause of the unintended acceleration rejected as this…

Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Filed: June 9, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 15-2635

Kelly, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products Liability. In action involving unintended acceleration in Toyota Camrys, the district court carefully weighed the admission of other similar incident evidence and did not abuse its discretion in admitting a limited number of substantially similar incidents; argument that the district court erred in allowing plaintiffs' expert to give his opinion regarding the cause of the unintended acceleration rejected as this…

Lisa Drayton v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation

Filed: April 26, 2017


Court: US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Number: 16-17252

DAVID GELBER V. TOYOTA MOTOR CORP

Filed: September 2, 2016


Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 13-56433

Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation

Filed: July 25, 2016


Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Case Number: 16-1267

Landry Dixon v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.

Filed: July 23, 2015


Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Case Number: 14-30426