Zeman v. Twitter, Inc. et al
Filed: April 18, 2024
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2023cv01786
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT denying 54 Motion to Dismiss. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/18/2024)
KIMBERLY COPELAND V. TWITTER, INC., ET AL
Filed: April 2, 2024
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 18-17327
Gerber, et al v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: March 29, 2024
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2023cv00186
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT re: 40 , Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint due by 4/19/2024. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2024)
B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: February 13, 2024
State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv00621
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding claim construction. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/13/24. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00621-GBW, 1:20-cv-00622-GBW (ntl)
In re: Search of Information Stored at Twitter, Inc. [ORDER IN SLIP OPINION FORMAT]
Filed: January 16, 2024
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Case Number: 23-5044
VidStream LLC v. Twitter Inc
Filed: December 18, 2023
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2016cv00764
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: This Order addresses the construction of several disputed claim terms pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370 (1996). Plaintiff VidStream, LLC ("VidStream") contends that Defendant Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") infringes two United States Patents.1 Having reviewed the relevant intrinsic evidence in the record, and such extrinsic evidence as necessary, the Court…
Thomas v. Twitter Corporate Office et al
Filed: December 6, 2023
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2022cv05341
OPINION AND ORDER re: 43 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint For Failure to State a Claim. filed by National Twitter Headquarters, Twitter Corporate Office. In accordance with the discussion herein, Plaintiff's Complaint is he reby DISMISSED for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), without leave to replead. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. The Clerk of Court is further…
Yeh v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: December 4, 2023
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2023cv01790
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 22 MOTION TO REMAND AND TERMINATING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS 31 MOTION TO DISMISS AND 32 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 12/4/2023. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023)
PRESS APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO JUDICIAL RECORDS IN CASE NO. 23-SC-31, IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY TWITTER, INC.
Filed: November 29, 2023
State: District of Columbia
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Case Number: 1:2023mc00084
MEMORANDUM OPINION re. Order 23 on Press Application. Signed by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 11/29/2023. (lcjeb1)
Morgan v. Twitter Inc
Filed: November 22, 2023
State: Washington
Court: Washington Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2022cv00122
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND 64 AND MOTION TO CERTIFY 67 , AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 43 . Case closed. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (CV, Courtroom Deputy)
Sifuentes v. Twitter Inc.
Filed: November 6, 2023
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Western District Court
Case Number: 1:2023cv00981
OPINION AND ORDER dismissing case for failure to state a claim; dismissing as moot Report and Recommendation 9 with respect to recommended dismissal based on res judicata and declining to adopt recommendation that Plaintiff be prohibited from proceeding in forma pauperis in future cases at this time; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
Morgan v. Twitter Inc
Filed: August 14, 2023
State: Washington
Court: Washington Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2022cv00122
ORDER GRANTING 44 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. All discovery and discovery deadlines in this case are stayed pending this Court's resolution of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (LTR, Case Administrator)
Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. Musk et al.
Filed: August 4, 2023
State: Delaware
Court: Court of Chancery
Case Number: 2022-0613-KSJM
Khalid v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: June 7, 2023
State: Delaware
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 463, 2022
Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh
Filed: May 18, 2023
State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 21-1496
Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh
Filed: May 18, 2023
State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 21-1496
Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh
Filed: May 18, 2023
State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 21-1496
Hall v. Twitter Inc.
Filed: May 9, 2023
State: New Hampshire
Court: New Hampshire District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv00536
///ORDER granting 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. So Ordered by Judge Samantha D. Elliott.(vln)
Borodaenko v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: May 5, 2023
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2022cv07226
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/5/2023 granting 14 Motion to Comple and 15 Motion to Dismiss. Amended Pleadings due by 5/26/2023. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/13/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/20/2023 02:00 PM via AT&T Telephonic Conference Only. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the…
Morgan v. Twitter Inc
Filed: May 5, 2023
State: Washington
Court: Washington Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2022cv00122
ORDER DENYING 8 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND. Signed by Judge Mary K. Dimke. (LAS, Case Administrator)
