Wilson v. Twitter
Filed: June 16, 2020
State: West Virginia
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2020cv00054
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 22 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; granting Defendant Twitter's 14 MOTION to Dismiss 2 Complaint and dismissing this case from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/16/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. TWITTER, INC.
Filed: March 16, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-1808
Public Citizen, Inc., Twitter, Inc. Et Al
Filed: February 25, 2020
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Western District Court
Case Number: 3:2020mc00003
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/25/2020. (hnw)
Retana et al v. Twitter Inc et al
Filed: December 5, 2019
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2019cv00359
Memorandum Opinion and Order: 38 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is granted and DISMISSES Plaintiffs' claims WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 12/5/2019) (svc)
Doshier et al v. Twitter Inc
Filed: September 27, 2019
State: Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 4:2018cv00700
ORDER granting 3 motion to transfer venue; and directing the Clerk to transfer this case immediately to the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/27/2019. (jbh)
Crosby v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: April 16, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Case Number: 18-1426
Clayborn et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
Filed: December 31, 2018
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2017cv06894
ORDER granting (53) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:17-cv-06894-LB; granting (47) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:18-cv-00543-LB.In the attached order, the court grants the defendants' motion to dismiss and dismisses the complaint. Because other courts have consistently rejected materially similar claims, the dismissal is without leave to amend and with prejudice. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 12/31/2018)
Crosby et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
Filed: April 2, 2018
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv14406
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER Granting Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing Case With Prejudice. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
Crosby et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
Filed: March 30, 2018
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv14406
OPINION AND ORDER Granting 37 Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing Case with Prejudice. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
TAMARA FIELDS V. TWITTER, INC.
Filed: January 31, 2018
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 16-17165
Anti-Terrorism Act. The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an action seeking civil remedies under the Anti-Terrorism Act against Twitter, Inc. Plaintiffs, whose family members were killed while working as government contractors in Jordan in an attack for which ISIS claimed credit, alleged injury “by reason of” Twitter’s knowing provision of material support to ISIS. The panel affirmed the district court’s holding that plaintiffs failed to…
EASYWEB INNOVATIONS, LLC v. TWITTER, INC.
Filed: May 12, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-2066
Cain et al v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: April 25, 2017
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2017cv00122
OPINION & ORDER re: 21 MOTION to Transfer Case Under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) to the Northern District of California (Re-filed Dkt. No. 14), filed by Twitter, Inc. Twitter's motion to transfer is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all open motions and transfer this case to the Northern District of California. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 4/25/2017) (anc)
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY FOR COMMUNICATIONS DATA WARRANTS TO OBTAIN THE CONTENTS OF STORED COMMUNICATIONS FROM TWITTER, INC
Filed: February 2, 2017
State: New Jersey
Court: Appellate Division (Published)
Case Number: a3651-15
P.J.A.D. This appeal presents an issue of first impression involving the Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act (the Act), N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-1 to -37. The State of New Jersey sought two communications data warrants (CDWs), N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-29(a), to obtain from Twitter, Inc., an extensive list of information and data associated with two specific Twitter accounts (the accounts), as well as the contents of those accounts.1 The Law Division judge approved both warrants but…
Fields v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: August 10, 2016
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2016cv00213
ORDER GRANTING 27 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiffs shall file their second amended complaint, if any, within 20 days of the date of this Order. (This entry replaces 46 Order on Motion to Dismiss which attached an incorrect PDF image.) Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/10/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2016)
Easyweb Innovations, LLC v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: March 30, 2016
State: New York
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2011cv04550
ORDER denying 53 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 67 Motion for Discovery; granting 91 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants summary judgment to Twitter on the patentability of abstract i deas defense pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101, and also grants summary judgment of noninfringement to Twitter. EasyWeb's motion for summary judgment is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Ordered…
Twitter, Inc. v. 1 Oak Private Equity Venture Capital Limited, et al.
Filed: January 5, 2016
State: Delaware
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 684, 2015
1 Oak Private Equity Venture Capital Limited, et al. v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: November 20, 2015
State: Delaware
Court: Superior Court
Case Number: N14C-10-186 CCLD
Twitter, Inc. v. Lynch et al
Filed: October 14, 2015
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv04480
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT AND, ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION, ORDERING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT IN LIGHT OF RECENT LEGISLATION by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ; denying 28 Motion to Dismiss. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2015)
Juice v Twitter, Inc.
Filed: August 29, 2014
Court: New York Other Courts
Citation: 2014 NY Slip Op 51335 (U)
