AMD Federal District Court Decisions

Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. S3 Graphics Co Ltd. et al

Filed: October 25, 2011 as 1:2011cv00965
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: S3 Graphics Co Ltd., S3 Graphics Inc.
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI International SRL, ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent

{SEALED} MEMORANDUM ORDER -- Granting 5 MOTION for Leave to File certain documents under seal; Denying 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 10/25/11. (ntl)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: October 18, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAY WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Order by Hon. William Alsup denying 327 Motion to Stay.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: July 6, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER REGARDING JOINT STATEMENT ON PERSONAL JURISDICTION TRIAL re 324 Statement, filed by Powerchip Technology Corporation, Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 6, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: April 28, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER REGARDING APRIL 8, 2011 JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER 290 . Signed by Judge Beeler on 4/28/11. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: April 25, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER REGARDING RICHTEK'S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL re 293 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal // Plaintiff's Administrative Motion for a Sealing Order Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 filed by Richtek Technology Corporation. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 25, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: March 18, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER STRIKING DOCKET ENTRIES 286 , 287 , AND 288 AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO FOLLOW STANDING ORDER FOR ADDRESSING DISCOVERY DISPUTES. Signed by Judge Beeler on 3/18/11. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: February 7, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

NOTICE OF REFERRAL AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Beeler on 2/7/11. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: February 3, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING MOTION FOR STAY, DENYING LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND VACATING HEARINGS by Judge Alsup granting in part and denying in part 219 Motion to Stay (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 24, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY DISPUTE [re 230 Order, Order to Show Cause, Set Deadlines/Hearings]. Meet and confer from 9:30 and ending 1:30 p.m. in Court's jury room. Discovery Hearing set for 2/15/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/24/2011. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 21, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER RE PERMISSION TO FILE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re 242 Letter filed by Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 21, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 19, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MING CHEN'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING by Judge Alsup granting in part and denying in part 196 Motion to Dismiss (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 18, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MAXCHIP'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Alsup granting in part and denying in part 158 Motion to Dismiss (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 14, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER ALLOWING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY AND SUSPENDING ALL MOTION PRACTICE re 135 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal) filed by Powerchip Technology Corporation. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 14, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 12, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND SETTING HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE re 229 Letter filed by Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 1/19/2011.. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 12, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 7, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

NOTICE REGARDING RESPONSES TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER re 215 Letter filed by Ming Chen, 211 Order. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 7, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 3, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 3, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2011)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 3, 2011 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION AND LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE AND LACK OF STANDING by Judge Alsup granting 121 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jur isdiction; granting 122 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; finding as moot 126 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 127 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 160 Motion for Joinder; finding as moot 161 Motion for Joinder;…

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: December 21, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER RE SCHEDULING OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Parties shall report requested information to Judge Ryu's Courtroom Deputy, Ivy Garcia, by no later than 1/12/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/21/2010. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2010)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: December 17, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 17, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2010)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: December 16, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

NOTICE ADVANCING HEARING DATE. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 16, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2010)