Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: December 15, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER re 172 Letter filed by George Chou, Wade Chen, Eric Huang, Ivy Yang, Sapphire Technology Limited, Ken Wang, Stone Hong, YP Huang, Silicon Xtal, Mars Lin, JC Chen, uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Vincent Wen, James Chang, Owen Hsu, Jay Tu, Doreen Liu, 173 Letter filed by Richtek USA, Inc., Richtek Technology Corporation. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 15, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: December 13, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' DISCOVERY DISPUTE [re 173 Letter filed by Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.] Discovery Hearing set for 12/15/2010 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Response due noon 12/14/2010. Meet-and-confer 12/15/2010 from 8:00--11:00 AM. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 12/10/2010. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: December 13, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO FILE OPPOSITION UNDER SEAL re 168 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Opposition to Certain Taiwanese Defendants' Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 13, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: November 23, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: November 2, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 2, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: October 14, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER ALLOWING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR UPI SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 14, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: October 4, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND TRANSFER ITC RECORD by Judge Alsup granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion to Lift Stay and Transfer ITC Record (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: September 27, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO LIFT STAY. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 27, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: September 7, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER allowing the filing of a reply to motion for reconsideration (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: September 7, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER withdrawing Motion #560 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: September 7, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER withdrawing Motion #455 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: September 1, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER allowing equipment (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2010)
Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: August 12, 2010 as 1:2009cv00628
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Apple Inc., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Dell Corp., Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I Ltd, Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Google Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., HTC America Inc., HTC Corp., Intel Corporation, LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., Marvell Semiconductor Inc., Marvell Technology Group Ltd., Microsoft Corporation, Motorola Inc., Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc., nVidia Corp., Palm Inc., Philips Electronics N.V., Philips Electronics North America Corp, Qualcomm Inc., Quicklogic Corp., Research In Motion Corp., Research In Motion LTD., Sony Corporation, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
and others
Plaintiff: Xpoint Technologies Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 8/12/2010. (nmf)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: August 11, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: August 5, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: August 5, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO AMD, DIAMOND, AND XFX. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 5, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2010)
Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al
Filed: August 2, 2010 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on August 2, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: May 17, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RE: OBJECTION TO CERTAIN EVIDENCE OFFERED BY AMD(Docket No. 471) (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: May 12, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER ALLOWING EQUIPMENT (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filed: May 12, 2010 as 3:2008cv00986
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Telecommunications America LLC
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent
).THE ORDER RE: HIGH SPEED CONNECT WAS FILED IN ERROR...THE ORDER HAS NOT BEEN GRANTED
