Michael Terpin v. AT and T Inc et al
Filed: May 25, 2021 as 2:2018cv06975
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Mobility LLC, Does 1-25, AT and T Inc, Does 1-10
Plaintiff: Michael Terpin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson re Stipulation for Protective Order 57 . (see document for details) (hr)
Isabel Ramos v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC et al
Filed: May 12, 2021 as 8:2020cv01477
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC, Brian Jacobson, AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc., AT and T Mobility Services LLC, Does 1 through 25, inclusive, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc.
Plaintiff: Isabel Ramos
Nature of Suit: Employment
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott re Stipulation for Protective Order. 24 (es)
(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
Filed: May 5, 2021 as 2:2020cv00255
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc., AT&T Corporation
Plaintiff: David C. Thacker
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/4/21 RECOMMENDING that 51 the joint stipulation of dismissal by plaintiff and defendants AT&T Corporation and AT&T Mobility, LLC be construed as a motion for voluntary dismissal by court order, under Rule 41(a)(2); the motion for voluntary dismissal be GRANTED; and all claims against AT&T Corporation and AT&T Mobility, LLC be DISMISSED with prejudice, with plaintiff and these defendants to bear their own…
Network Apps, LLC et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: April 9, 2021 as 1:2021cv00718
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T CORP., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: KYLE SCHEI, JOHN WANTZ, NETWORK APPS, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER: There is currently an initial pretrial conference in this action scheduled for April 22, 2021. On April 5, 2021, the Court received three letter motions from Defendants: the first two pertaining to Defendants' anticipated motions to d ismiss the Complaint and to disqualify Plaintiffs' counsel (Dkt. #46-47), and the third requesting the bifurcation of discovery (Dkt. #48). On April 8, 2021, Plaintiffs submitted three letters in opposition to each of Defendants'…
CIRCLE CITY BROADCASTING I, LLC et al v. AT&T SERVICES, INC., ET AL
Filed: April 8, 2021 as 1:2020cv02108
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T CORP. D/B/A U-VERSE AND DIRECTV, AT&T CORP doing business as U-VERSE doing business as DIRECTV, AT&T SERVICES, INC., DIRECTV, LLC
Plaintiff: CIRCLE CITY BROADCASTING I, LLC, DUJUAN MCCOY
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE - Although the Court has sustained many of AT&T's objections, the Court has also recognized that AT&T will need to further supplement its production, and left the door open for…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 7, 2021 as 2:2019cv01837
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/6/2021 GRANTING 72 Motion for Extension, EXTENDING deadlines as follows: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment due by 6/25/2021. Opposition and Cross-Motion due by 7/16/2021. Plaintiff's Reply and Opposition due by 7/30/2021. Defendant's Reply due by 8/13/2021. Cross-Motion Hearing set for 9/14/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Coll, A)
(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
Filed: April 2, 2021 as 2:2020cv00255
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc., AT&T Corporation
Plaintiff: David C. Thacker
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/1/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 47 Findings and Recommendations. GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART 42 motion for leave to file the proposed amended complaint as a Second Amended Complaint. D ENYING leave to join AT&T Phone / U-Verse and AT&T Communications, LLC as additional defendants in this action, and GRANTING leave to join AT&T Mobility, LLC as an additional defendant in this action. The Clerk of Court shall update the…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 31, 2021 as 2:2019cv01837
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/30/2021 CONTINUING 67 Motion to Compel Hearing to 5/7/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Within 14 days of the date of this order the parties shall me et and confer via telephone or over video conference in an effort to narrow and/or resolve this dispute. On or before 4/30/2021, if the parties have not resolved this dispute, they shall file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement that…
AT&T Corp. v. Level 3 Communications, LLC
Filed: March 25, 2021 as 1:2018cv00112
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Level 3 Communications, LLC
Plaintiff: AT&T Corp.
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER the Court GRANTS IN PART Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 152 ) and rules that, pursuant to the settlement agreement, Plaintiff is entitled to a fifty percent refund for end office switching charges assessed during the relevant period (January 1, 2019 to February 19, 2020), during which time the OTT percentage did not exceed 21 percent. The Court DENIES Defendant's motion to the extent it seeks further relief. The Court also DENIES Plaintiff's…
Cottrell v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: March 17, 2021 as 3:2019cv07672
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Pacific Bell Company, AT&T Inc., DirecTV, LLC
Plaintiff: David Cottrell
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting in part and denying in part 66 Motion to for Leave to Amend; and denying 67 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Public versions of documents sought to be sealed shall be filed no earlier than 3/22/2021 and no later than 3/29/2021. Amended complaint due 3/31/2021. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2021)
Jerman v. AT&T Corporation
Filed: March 12, 2021 as 3:2020cv00384
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corporation
Plaintiff: Melvin McCoy Jerman
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Strike 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment without prejudice to Plaintiffs right to re-file the motion. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 3/12/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ams)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 11, 2021 as 3:2020cv01451
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 23 ] and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to docket Dkt. No. 23-1 as Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 3/11/2021) (hml)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: February 18, 2021 as 3:2017cv00161
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
ENTRY AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 152 ; (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS KRIEGER BEARD SERVICES, LLC AND DUSTIN KRIEGER 145 ; AND (3) DIRECTING THAT THE CL ERK ENTER JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS KRIEGER BEARD SERVICES, LLC AND DUSTIN KRIEGER AS FOLLOWS: PLAINTIFFS ARE AWARDED $346,471.82 IN DAMAGES AND $29,300.00 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 2-18-2021.…
Capadanno v. AT&T Corp
Filed: February 8, 2021 as 2:2020cv01690
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp
Plaintiff: John Capadanno
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(PM) cc: Plaintiff via USPS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: February 8, 2021 as 2:2019cv01837
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/5/2021. (Zignago, K.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: January 26, 2021 as 3:2017cv00161
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs motion for default judgment (Doc. 145 ) be GRANTED; 2. Judgment be ENTERED against KBS and Krieger as follows: a. Plaintiffs be AWARDED $346,471.82, representing the total of compensatory and liquid damages warranted under the FLSA; and b. Plaintiffs counsel be AWARDED $29,300.00 in attorneys fees. Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 01/23/2021.…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: January 20, 2021 as 2:2020cv01027
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 01/20/2021. (AKD)
Capadanno v. AT&T Corp
Filed: December 29, 2020 as 2:2020cv01690
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp
Plaintiff: John Capadanno
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 8 Motion for Service by U.S. Marshal. The Court directs the U.S. Marshals to effectuate service on Defendant. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) cc: order to Plaintiff via USPS. Copy of order, complaint, issued summons, and USM 285 Form emailed to the U.S. Marshal's Office.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 29, 2020 as 2:2019cv01837
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/28/2020 GRANTING 58 Motion for Extension of Case Deadlines and ORDERING: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment due by 4/27/2021, Defendant's opposition and cross motion due by 5/18/2021, Plaintiffs reply and opposition due by 6/1/2021, Defendants reply due by 6/8/2021, and Hearing on the cross motions is set for 6/22/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Tupolo, A)
AT&T Corp v. J&J Schlaegel Inc.
Filed: December 18, 2020 as 3:2019cv00192
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: J&J Schlaegel Inc.
Plaintiff: AT&T Corp
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT J&J SCHLAEGEL, INC. (DOC. # 30 ), AND OVERRULING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO LIABILITY OF PLAINTIFF AT&T CORPORATION (DOC. # 37 ). Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/18/2020. (srb)
