AT&T Corp v. J&J Schlaegel Inc.
Filed: December 18, 2020 as 3:2019cv00192
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: J&J Schlaegel Inc.
Plaintiff: AT&T Corp
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT J&J SCHLAEGEL, INC.S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f) (DOC. # 48 ) AND PLAINTIFF AT&T CORPORATIONS MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 11(DOC. # 50 ). Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/18/2020. (srb)
Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
Filed: December 17, 2020 as 3:2018cv01776
Court: Puerto Rico District Court
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff: Felix J. Lahens
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
OPINION AND ORDER granting 92 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Marcos E. Lopez on 12/17/2020. (JZ)
Ulery v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: December 12, 2020 as 1:2020cv02354
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff: DAVID ULERY
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12 December 2020. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that "Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Stay Pending the Supreme Court's Decision in Facebook v. Duguid" (Doc. No. 29 ) is GRANTED. Discov ery in this matter is STAYED pending the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, No. 19-511 (U.S. July 9, 2020). The parties shall file a joint status report within ten days of the United States Supreme…
HD Carrier LLC v. AT and T Corp
Filed: December 2, 2020 as 2:2020cv06509
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Corp.
Plaintiff: HD Carrier LLC
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON (1) PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [Dkt. No. 11]; AND (2) DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [Dkt. No. 22] by Judge John W. Holcomb. For the foregoing reasons, the Court will enter an Order DENYING Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on the issue of subject matter jurisdiction and GRANTING that Motion to the extent that it seeks a stay of this action. The Court will DENY Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary…
James Chen v. AT and T Mobility LLC et al
Filed: November 12, 2020 as 2:2020cv07897
Court: California Central District Court
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Rebecca Callahan
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT and T Mobility LLC, Does 1-100 Inclusive, Does 1-10 Inclusive
Plaintiff: James Chen
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim re Stipulation for Protective Order 12 . (see document for details) (hr)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: November 9, 2020 as 2:2019cv01837
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/9/2020 GRANTING Plaintiff's 49 Motion to Compel. Defendant shall produce responsive discovery within twenty-one days. Defendant's 52 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
(PS) Lewis v. AT&T et al
Filed: November 6, 2020 as 2:2020cv00461
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: T-Mobile, Sprint, AT&T
Plaintiff: Derrick Jerome Lewis
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/5/2020 ADOPTING IN FULL 6 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 4 First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
Holder v. AT&T Services, Inc.
Filed: October 28, 2020 as 3:2020cv00310
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This action is DISMISSED, and the Court CERTIFIES that any appeal in this matter would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3). Plaintiff's federal-law claims are dismissed with prejudice, and her state-la w claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Court makes no representations regarding the viability of any state law claims Plaintiff may file in state court. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 10/28/2020. (xc:Pro se party by…
(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Corporation et al
Filed: October 23, 2020 as 2:2020cv00255
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc., AT&T Corporation
Plaintiff: David C. Thacker
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/23/2020 VACATING the 11/4/2020 and 11/18/2020 motion hearings; DENYING Plaintiff's 27 motion to compel without prejudice to re-filing; GRANTING Defense counsel's 26 motion t o withdraw; ORDERING Attorney Kirkpatrick to serve a copy of this order on Diversified Consultants, Inc., and if known, provide the court with the last known address or other contact information of Diversified Consultants, Inc. forthwith;…
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, et al.
Filed: October 8, 2020 as 2:2013cv00007
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Ed Bowlin, Connie Bowlin, Aviation Autographs, Bowlin & Associates, Inc., Law Offices of Joanna R. Mendoza, P.C., de la Pena & Holiday, LLP, Lesser Law Group, Charles E. Yeager
Plaintiff: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/6/2020 ORDERING that Parsons Behle's motions to enforce the settlement agreement are GRANTED. All claims in the Complaint-in-Intervention (ECF No. 93 ) are DISMISSED with preju dice with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. The Court enters FINAL JUDGMENT in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager et al., No. 2:13-cv-00007-KJM-DAD, GRANTING General Yeager and Victoria Yeager exclusive rights to the…
Martinez Patterson v. AT&T Services Inc
Filed: September 30, 2020 as 2:2018cv01180
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc
Plaintiff: Maria Del Carmen Martinez Patterson
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER granting Defendant's 45 Motion for Testimony. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 10/12/2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 24, 2020 as 3:2019cv02624
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 6 Motion to Dismiss. The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and DISMISSES Count II of plaintiffs' complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court also DENIES plaintiffs' request to replead and DENIES plaintiffs' request to stay the case. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 9/24/2020) (jmg)
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: September 22, 2020 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/21/2020. (Initial Disclosures: October 14, 2020; Non-expert Discovery Cutoff: March 15, 2022; Expert Disclosure: February 8, 2022; Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: March 8, 2022; Expert Discovery Cutoff: April 12, 2022; Non-Dispositive Motion Deadline: June 3, 2022; Dispositive Motion Deadline: July 1, 2022; Telephonic August 5, 2022, Status Conference: 10:00 A.M.) (Marrujo, C)
Stegemann v. Rensselaer County Sheriff's Office et al
Filed: September 15, 2020 as 1:2015cv00021
Court: New York Northern District Court
Defendant: Rensselaer County Sheriff's Office, Rensselaer County, Rensselaer County District Attorney's Office, Jack Mahar, Pat Russo, Art Hyde, Steve Wohlleber, William Webster, Shane Holcomb, J.S. Robelotto, Mark Geracitano, Sandra Blodgett, Justin Walread, Jami Panichi, Air National Guard, Richard J. Sloma, Chris Clifford, Warren County Sheriff's Office, Warren County, Nathan York, Christopher Perilli, New York State Police, New York State Police Sort, "Dan" Kiley, Fulton County Sheriff's Office, Fulton County, Berkshire County Sheriff's Office, Berkshire County, Thomas Bowler, Scott Colbert, Pittsfield Police Department, Michael Wynn
and others
Plaintiff: Joshua G. Stegemann
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
DECISION & ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Subsurface Information Surveys, Inc.'s # 424 motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's # 425 motion for reconsideration, is hereby DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on September 15, 2020. (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail)(kmp)
AGBARA v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC et al
Filed: September 10, 2020 as 1:2019cv02945
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Defendant: KINSLEY KELECHI OGIDEH, LIVINITY OKPARAEKE, AT&T MOBILITY LLC, CHARLES EDEH, NIGERIAN CATHOLIC COMMUNITY AT ST. JEROME CATHOLIC CHURCH, EVELYN ONYENYI OKOJI
Plaintiff: EMMANUEL AGBARA
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 9/10/2020. (DJS)
(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Corporation et al
Filed: September 10, 2020 as 2:2020cv00255
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc., AT&T Corporation
Plaintiff: David C. Thacker
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/10/2020 DENYING 22 Motion for Additional Discovery and VACATING the 9/16/2020 hearing. Plaintiff is advised to follow Local Rule 251 for any additional discovery disputes in this matter. (Huang, H)
Michael Terpin v. AT and T Inc et al
Filed: September 8, 2020 as 2:2018cv06975
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Mobility LLC, Does 1-25, AT and T Inc, Does 1-10
Plaintiff: Michael Terpin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 43 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court finds it premature to dismiss Doe defendants 1-10, as they are permitted by Local Rule 19-1 and facts may develop during discovery which enable Mr. Terpin to identify the Does. However, as no complaint may include more than ten Doe defendants, the Court GRANTS AT&T's motion to dismiss Doe defendants 11-25 with prejudice. (lc) Modified on 9/8/2020 (lc). Modified on 9/8/2020 (lc).
Cottrell v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: August 19, 2020 as 3:2019cv07672
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Pacific Bell Company, AT&T Inc., DirecTV, LLC
Plaintiff: David Cottrell
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 8/21/2020 at 2:00 PM. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2020)
Adams v. AT&T et al
Filed: August 19, 2020 as 7:2020cv02015
Court: South Carolina District Court
Defendant: Transunion Inc, AT&T, Experian Inc, Equifax Inc
Plaintiff: Jerry Odell Adams
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
ORDER adopting 14 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 8/19/20. (kmca)
Mallory v. AT&T
Filed: August 19, 2020 as 4:2019cv00900
Court: Missouri Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Angie Mallory
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER granting 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed on 8/19/2020 by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk)
