Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: June 3, 2020 as 2:2015cv01462
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER granting parties' 53 Joint Motion to Extend Stay. AT&T will report to the Court by no later than December 1, 2020 regarding the current status of all federal criminal investigations into the Defendants and whether there are grounds that would warrant allowing the case to remain open. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
Peerless Network, Inc. et al v. AT&T Corp.
Filed: June 2, 2020 as 1:2015cv00870
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: Peerless Network, Inc., Peerless Network of Arkansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Arizona, LLC, Peerless Network of California, LLC, Peerless Network of Colorado, LLC, Peerless Network of Connecticut, LLC, Peerless Network of Delaware, LLC, Peerless Network of the District of Columba, LLC, Peerless Network of Florida, LLC, Peerless Network of Georgia, LLC, Peerless Network of Illinois, LLC, Peerless Network of Indiana, LLC, Peerless Network of Kansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Kentucky, LLC, Peerless Network of Louisana, LLC, Peerless Network of Maine, LLC, Peerless Network of Massachusetts, LLC, Peerless Network of Michigan, LLC, Peerless Network of Minnesota, LLC, Peerless Network of Nevada, LLC, Peerless Network of New Hampshire, LLC, Peerless Network of New Jersey, LLC, Peerless Network of New York, LLC, Peerless Network of North Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Ohio, LLC, Peerless Network of Oklahoma, LLC, Peerless Network of Oregon, LLC, Peerless Network of Pennsylvania, LLC, Peerless Network of Rhode Island, LLC, Peerless Network of South Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Tennessee, LLC, Peerless Network of Utah, LLC
and others
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER: By letter dated June 1, 2020, plaintiffs in the above captioned action request a pre-motion conference and leave to file a motion to enforce the parties' July 27, 2018 settlement agreement. (See Dkt. Nos. 100, 101). Defendant AT&T Corp. is hereby ordered to respond to plaintiffs' letter by letter not to exceed three pages within three days of the entry of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 6/02/2020) (ama)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: June 1, 2020 as 2:2018cv00599
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS defendant's 23 MOTION for Reconsideration; DENIES plaintiffs' 42 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment; and DENIES defendant's 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior District Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/1/2020. (cc: counsel of record and any unrepresented parties) (arb)
FOWLER v. AT&T, INC. et al
Filed: May 31, 2020 as 3:2018cv00667
Court: New Jersey District Court
Defendant: AT&T, INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN FOWLER
Nature of Suit: Employment
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 5/30/2020. (gxh)
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC v. Boyd
Filed: May 21, 2020 as 1:2019cv02539
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Defendant: Robert Boyd
Plaintiff: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For all the reasons set forth in this order, Defendant Robert Boyd's Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery (Doc. No. 18 ) and Motion for Leave to File Supplement to Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery Instanter and Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jeremy Dunlap (Doc. No. 20 ) are DENIED. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 5/21/2020. (L,Ja)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 10, 2020 as 3:2017cv00161
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 127 ; AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF AUNSHAWN HENDERSON'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 125 WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILE A SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE OF DAMAGES. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5-10-2020. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
AT&T Corp v. J&J Schlaegel Inc.
Filed: May 6, 2020 as 3:2019cv00192
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: J&J Schlaegel Inc.
Plaintiff: AT&T Corp
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Plaintiff AT&T's Motion for Extension of Time is hereby granted. Plaintiff shall have until on or before May 12, 2020 to file an opposition to Defendant J&J Schlaegel, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/5/2020. (srb)
Sterling et al v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al
Filed: May 6, 2020 as 3:2018cv01310
Court: Connecticut District Court
Defendant: ABRY Partners, Securus Technologies, Inc., Platinum Equity LLC, AT&T Corp
Plaintiff: Christopher Shuckra, Marlon Brathwaite, David V Myles, Harold Sterling
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER granting 117 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated in the attached Ruling and Order, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/6/2020. (Garcia, A.)
Gutierrez, et al. v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, et al.
Filed: May 6, 2020 as 2:2014cv00351
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, AT&T Digital Life, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: Ramses Gutierrez, Jonathan Jacob, Toussaint Chivars, Joshua Espiritu, Patrick Williams, Sam Preeg, Ricardo Sapasap, Armando Torres, Keondre Masters, Gianfranco Uy, Christopher Addo, Alan Osorio, Keith Polee, Earl Gray, Zachary Finer
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/5/2020 GRANTING 131 Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement and Entry of Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al
Filed: April 15, 2020 as 2:2017cv00718
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP, T-Mobile, USA, Inc., Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Telenav, Inc.
Not Yet Classified: William Joseph Cornelius, Donald E Tiller
Plaintiff: Traxcell Technologies, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 399 Report and Recommendations, 445 Report and Recommendations, 444 Report and Recommendations,. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 4/15/2020. (nkl, )
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 15, 2020 as 3:2017cv00161
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF AUNSHAWN HENDERSONS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DOC. 125 ) BE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILE A SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE OF DAMAGES. Objections to R&R due by 4/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 4/15/2020. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 2, 2020 as 1:2018cv13602
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
OPINION and ORDER Granting Defendant's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Case. (Terminating 28 Motion in Limine.) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Kanzigg et al
Filed: March 27, 2020 as 2:2017cv00105
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Kanzigg, Ricki Frederica Fulton, Michael J. Kirk (Remainderman), Russ Kiko Jr., Mark L. McCoy, CCLC Partners, LLC, Rose Derezic, Howard A Fulton, Tanya S. Gartrell, Hollowrock Oil and Gas, LLC, Robert Clark, Thomas J Shaw, Jeffco Resources, Inc., Tri-State Gas Co., Verizon North, Inc., Paul Jr. Melanko, Josephine L Brinker, North American Coal Royalty Company, Donna Jean Pittman Bedford, Robert Eric McDonald, Ameritrust Company, Todd W Hixson, Samuel C. Davis, George P. Kiko, Trustee of the Ronald P. Kiko and Diane L. Kiko Joint Revocable Trust, Siltstone Resources, LLC, Vesna Kovacic, Rice Olympus Midstream, LLC, Jesse N Diday, CHK Exploration, LLC, John R Major, Vernajean Newburn, Clara Riggenbach
and others
Interested Party: Tom Horner, Gerald Frank Hinkle, Craig Paynter, Shawn Judge, Sarah Herbert, April Bott
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Nature of Suit: Land Condemnation
ORDER denying 920 Motion for Supplemental Instructions. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/27/2020. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 23, 2020 as 3:2018cv03429
Court: Texas Northern District Court
ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court SUSTAINS Defendants objections to the FCR. Accordingly, the FCR is ACCEPTED in part and REJECTED in part. t he Court GRANTS Defendants 37 motion to dismiss. Thus, the Employee-Defendants and the Board of Director Defendants are DISMISSED from this case based on Plaintiffs failure to properly serve them. Further, the Court DISMISSES…
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
Filed: March 20, 2020 as 3:2018cv01842
Court: South Carolina District Court
Defendant: Armstrong International Inc, Schneider Electric USA Inc, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand Company, Gardner Denver Inc, Trane US Inc, Fluor Enterprises Inc, Fluor Constructors International, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Southwire Company LLC, Warren Pumps LLC, Covil Corporation, Daniel International Corporation, API Heat Transfer Inc, IMO Industries Inc, Marmon Engineered Wire & Cable, General Electric Company, Ecodyne Corporation, Carrier Corporation, Jerguson Gage & Valve Company, Flowserve US Inc, Rockwell Automation Inc, Clark-Reliance Corporation, Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc, AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp, AT&T Corporation, Fluor Constructors International Inc, Nokia of America Corporation, Crane Co, Alfa Laval Inc, Nash Engineering Company, The, Goulds Pumps Inc
and others
Plaintiff: Paul E Cruise, Mary Ann Robertson
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
ORDER: Based on the representations to the Court and for good cause shown, all claims brought against Defendants Spirax Sarco, Inc, Jerguson Gage & Valve Company, d/b/a Clark-Reliance Corporation, and The Aurora Pump Company are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Signed by the Honorable Sherri A Lydon on 3/20/2020. (lgib, )
Hughes v. AT&T et al
Filed: March 16, 2020 as 3:2019cv00179
Court: Alaska District Court
Defendant: NANA Management, AT&T, Dimond Center Mall
Plaintiff: Johnathan Charles Hughes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
ORDER RE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Final Report and Recommendation. The First Amended Complaint is dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 3/16/20. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 12, 2020 as 1:2018cv01804
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 3/12/2020 denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
Michael Terpin v. AT and T Inc et al
Filed: February 24, 2020 as 2:2018cv06975
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Mobility LLC, Does 1-25, AT and T Inc, Does 1-10
Plaintiff: Michael Terpin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 33 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS, IN PART, and DENIES, IN PART, AT&Ts Motion to Dismiss. Mr. Terpin may amend the FAC to address the deficiencies identified above within 21 days from the date of this Order. (lc). Modified on 2/24/2020 .(lc).
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: February 20, 2020 as 2:2019cv08392
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh re Stipulation for Protective Order 20 . [See Order for details.] (et)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: February 12, 2020 as 4:2018cv00647
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
MEMORANDUM OPINION For the reasons explained within, the Defendants' motion for final judgment (doc. 39 ) is due to be GRANTED and Washburn's motion for final judgment (doc. 40 ) is due to be DENIED. The Court will enter an order consistent with this opinion forthwith. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 2/12/2020. (SRD)
