Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 12, 2020 as 1:2018cv01804
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 3/12/2020 denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
Michael Terpin v. AT and T Inc et al
Filed: February 24, 2020 as 2:2018cv06975
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Mobility LLC, Does 1-25, AT and T Inc, Does 1-10
Plaintiff: Michael Terpin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 33 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS, IN PART, and DENIES, IN PART, AT&Ts Motion to Dismiss. Mr. Terpin may amend the FAC to address the deficiencies identified above within 21 days from the date of this Order. (lc). Modified on 2/24/2020 .(lc).
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: February 20, 2020 as 2:2019cv08392
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh re Stipulation for Protective Order 20 . [See Order for details.] (et)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: February 12, 2020 as 4:2018cv00647
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
MEMORANDUM OPINION For the reasons explained within, the Defendants' motion for final judgment (doc. 39 ) is due to be GRANTED and Washburn's motion for final judgment (doc. 40 ) is due to be DENIED. The Court will enter an order consistent with this opinion forthwith. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 2/12/2020. (SRD)
ABGARA v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC et al
Filed: February 11, 2020 as 1:2019cv01823
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Defendant: AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT, EVELYN ONYENYI OKOJI
Plaintiff: EMMANUEL ABGARA
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION regarding Defendant AT&T's 5 Motion to Compel Arbitration, Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Declaratory Judgment, and Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 2/11/2020. (lcdl)
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: February 5, 2020 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER of Recusal and Vacating Scheduling Conference Date; New Case Number is 1:20-cv-000172 NONE-JDP, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/4/2020. (Martin-Gill, S)
Vitcom, LLC v. AT&T Corp.
Filed: January 16, 2020 as 1:2019cv00295
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: Vitcom, LLC
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER granting 19 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 2/28/2020 at 12:30 PM before Judge Louis L. Stanton.) (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 1/16/2020) (rro)
AT&T Services, Inc. et al v. Max Retrans LLC
Filed: January 16, 2020 as 4:2019cv01925
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Defendant: Max Retrans LLC
Plaintiff: AT&T Services, Inc., DirecTV, LLC
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Max Retrans LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22 ) is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED, with prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will accompany this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins on 1/16/2020. (TMT)
Stone v. AT&T Corp. et al
Filed: January 14, 2020 as 3:2018cv02028
Court: California Southern District Court
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: John Stone
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Vehicle's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/13/20. (dlg)
Sol IP, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Filed: January 6, 2020 as 2:2018cv00526
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Sprint Corporation, Verizon Communications Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Not Yet Classified: David Folsom, Daniel Weinstein, David Keyzer, Scott Woloson
Petitioner: Ericsson, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sol IP, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING WI-FI PATENTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 1/5/2020. (nkl, )
Sol IP, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Filed: January 6, 2020 as 2:2018cv00526
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Sprint Corporation, Verizon Communications Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Not Yet Classified: David Folsom, Daniel Weinstein, David Keyzer, Scott Woloson
Petitioner: Ericsson, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sol IP, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 213 SEALED PATENT MOTION TO COMPEL SOL IP TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' INTERROGATORIES filed by Ericsson, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Communications Company L.P., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Sprint Spectrum L.P... Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 1/5/2020. (nkl, )
Hughes v. AT&T et al
Filed: December 27, 2019 as 3:2019cv00179
Court: Alaska District Court
Defendant: NANA Management, AT&T, Dimond Center Mall
Plaintiff: Johnathan Charles Hughes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
ORDER RE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Final Report and Recommendation 8 . The Complaint, at docket 1 , is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Motion to Appoint Counsel, at docket 6 , is DENIED without prejudice. The Application to Waive Filing Fee, at docket 3 , is DEFERRED. Signed by Judge Sharon L. Gleason on 12/27/19. (JLH, COURT STAFF)
Gaines et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC et al
Filed: December 10, 2019 as 3:2019cv00946
Court: California Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Emmanuel (Manny) Morales, Does 1 through 50
Plaintiff: Kenyata Martin, Branisha Newberry, Ryan Bagsby, Mario Hall, Jr., Dolores Gaines
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER Denying AT&T's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Denying AT&T's Motion to Strike 30 , 31 . Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 12/10/19. (dlg)
Smith v. AT&T
Filed: December 4, 2019 as 4:2019cv00881
Court: Missouri Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Carrie Smith
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER denying 7 Plaintiff's motion to stay. Signed on 12/4/2019 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Phillips, Caleb)
Gutierrez, et al. v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, et al.
Filed: December 4, 2019 as 2:2014cv00351
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, AT&T Digital Life, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: Ramses Gutierrez, Jonathan Jacob, Toussaint Chivars, Joshua Espiritu, Patrick Williams, Sam Preeg, Ricardo Sapasap, Armando Torres, Keondre Masters, Gianfranco Uy, Christopher Addo, Alan Osorio, Keith Polee, Earl Gray, Zachary Finer
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/3/2019 GRANTING 126 Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class Settlement and Direction of Notice. Phoenix Class Action Administration Solutions of Orange, California, is APPOINTED as class administrator. The parties are directed to give notice to putative class members. The draft notice of settlement submitted to the Court as Exhibit D to the Declaration of Joseph W. Rose is APPROVED. The final approval hearing is…
Sabella, et al v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
Filed: November 21, 2019 as 2:2018cv09696
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff: Salvador Sabella, Sabella's Plumbing Co., Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER granting 21 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 11/20/19. (ko)
(PS) Clay v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
Filed: November 1, 2019 as 2:2017cv00749
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center
Plaintiff: Jerome A. Clay
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/31/2019 RECOMMENDING that 71 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in full, that judgment be entered for Defendant, and that the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)
Morrison v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
Filed: October 24, 2019 as 1:2019cv01257
Court: Maryland District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff: Tyler Morrison
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
MEMORANDUM. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 10/23/2019. (krs, Deputy Clerk)
FEATHERSTONE v. AT&T et al
Filed: October 24, 2019 as 3:2017cv00837
Court: Florida Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T, DIRECTV, IQOR, KAYLEIGH WHITE, STEPHANIE MILLER, MISSY DALRYMPLE
Plaintiff: JAMMIE FEATHERSTONE
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants AT&T, DirectTV, iQor, Kayleigh White, Stephanie Miller, and Missy Dalrymple's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 25 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Counts 1 and 2 s et forth in Plaintiff's second amended complaint, ECF No. 10 , are DISMISSED as to all Defendants. Count 3 is DISMISSED as to all Defendants except Defendant AT&T. Defendant AT&T shall, within fourteen (14) days, answer the second amended complaint.…
Martinez Patterson v. AT&T Services Inc
Filed: October 18, 2019 as 2:2018cv01180
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc
Plaintiff: Maria Del Carmen Martinez Patterson
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER Re: Motions to Seal. Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (Dkt. # 20 ) is DENIED. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall re-file the exhibits (Dkt. # 23 ) with redactions of identifying information in the performa nce reviews, Ex. M, and any identifying information or otherwise sensitive material in the internal message exchange, Ex. R; Defendant's Motion to Seal (Dkt. # 27 ) is GRANTED and the filing shall remainsealed. Signed by Judge Ricardo…
