AT&T Federal District Court Decisions

Simpson v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC et al

Filed: April 22, 2019 as 4:2018cv00989
Court: Missouri Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Iesha Lynch
Plaintiff: J. D. Simpson
Nature of Suit: Employment

ORDER granting 13 motion to remand. Signed on April 22, 2019, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk)

Bernzen v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC et al

Filed: April 22, 2019 as 4:2018cv00987
Court: Missouri Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Iesha Lynch
Plaintiff: R. G. Bernzen
Nature of Suit: Employment

ORDER granting 12 motion to remand. Signed on April 22, 2019, by District Judge Greg Kays. (Law Clerk)

Strong v. AT&T Services, Inc.

Filed: April 22, 2019 as 2:2018cv02489
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Glenna Strong
Nature of Suit: Employment

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/19/19 REFERRING case to VDRP; the parties shall file a joint status report notifying the court of the status of settlement proceedings 60 days (cc: VDRP). (Benson, A.)

AT&T Corporation v. SpeedNet-SEM LLC

Filed: April 9, 2019 as 1:2018cv12791
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Defendant: SpeedNet-SEM LLC
Plaintiff: AT&T Corporation
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment

ORDER Granting Defendant's 12 Motion for Leave to File Late Response and Plaintiff's 9 Motion to Amend Complaint. (Amended Complaint due by 4/16/2019.) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin)

BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC et al v. City of Daphne et al

Filed: April 4, 2019 as 1:2018cv00335
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Defendant: City of Daphne, Dane Haygood, Jeremy Sasser
Plaintiff: AT&T Corp., BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC doing business as AT&T Alabama
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage

ORDER DENYING 43 Emergency MOTION and Memorandum of Law to Enforce Preliminary Injunction, and for Award of Fees, Costs, and Other Appropriate Relief, by AT&T Corp. as set out. To the extent Defendants assert this case has been rendered moot, that is also DENIED. The preliminary injunction remains in full force and effect. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 04/04/2019. (srd)

Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rohrs, et al

Filed: April 2, 2019 as 3:2017cv00225
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Defendant: Brian D. Rohrs, Rita Arend Rohrs, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, David Steinberger, ANR Pipeline Company, Karl J Steinberger, Patricia A. Steinberger, Ruth E. Steinberger, Phillip L. Hornish, Denise M. Hornish, Farm Credit Services of Mid-America, FLCA, Charles D. Hornish, Lois E. Hornish, Harold L. Hornish, Jean A. Hornish, Ohio Gas Company, Toledo Edison Company, Chase National Bank of the City of New York, Evelyn Hornish Schlosser, Sherri Klingshirn, Unknown Heirs of Evelyn Mack, Deceased, Unknown Heirs of Donelda Wilhelm, Deceased, Unknown Heirs of Geraldine Goon, Deceased, Unknown Heirs of Charles Westrick, Deceased, Homer Edward Rudy, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, State Bank and Trust Company, Farmers & Merchants State Bank, Wallace J. Ordway, Marcella D. Ordway, Timothy N. Miller, Tamara S. Miller and others
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Nature of Suit: Land Condemnation

Order : The motion for reconsideration (Doc. 395 ) be, and the same hereby is, granted in part and denied in part as provided herein. The request to certify an order for interlocutory appeal be, and the same hereby is, denied. Rover's request for sanctions (Doc. 396 ) be, and the same hereby is, denied. Judge James G. Carr on 4/2/19.(C,D)

Gadelhak v. AT&T Services, Inc.

Filed: March 29, 2019 as 1:2017cv01559
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: Ali Gadelhak
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Plaintiff Gadelhak's motion 67 for partial summary judgment is denied and Defendant AT&T's motion 50 for summary judgment is granted. A separate AO-450 judgment shall be entered. The status hearing of 04/04/2019 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice(slb, )

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: March 29, 2019 as 2:2017cv00091
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 40 is DENIED; and (2) Within twenty (20) days from the date of entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report, setting forth available dates for a Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial, and whether they would be amenable to a court-facilitated settlement Conference on the remaining claims.. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 03/29/2019.(KRB)cc: COR

Rover Pipeline LLC v. Kanzigg et al

Filed: March 26, 2019 as 2:2017cv00105
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Kanzigg, Ricki Frederica Fulton, Michael J. Kirk (Remainderman), Russ Kiko Jr., Mark L. McCoy, CCLC Partners, LLC, Rose Derezic, Howard A Fulton, Tanya S. Gartrell, Hollowrock Oil and Gas, LLC, Robert Clark, Thomas J Shaw, Jeffco Resources, Inc., Tri-State Gas Co., Verizon North, Inc., Paul Jr. Melanko, Josephine L Brinker, North American Coal Royalty Company, Donna Jean Pittman Bedford, Robert Eric McDonald, Ameritrust Company, Todd W Hixson, Samuel C. Davis, George P. Kiko, Trustee of the Ronald P. Kiko and Diane L. Kiko Joint Revocable Trust, Siltstone Resources, LLC, Vesna Kovacic, Rice Olympus Midstream, LLC, Jesse N Diday, CHK Exploration, LLC, John R Major, Vernajean Newburn, Clara Riggenbach and others
Interested Party: Tom Horner, Gerald Frank Hinkle, Craig Paynter, Shawn Judge, Sarah Herbert, April Bott
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Nature of Suit: Land Condemnation

ORDER granting 803 Motion for TRO. This TRO is in effect for 14 days and therefore shall expire on April 8, 2019. Rover shall post bond equal to the final offer amount to the landowners, by noon on March 27, 2019. For the Kanzig property, that amount is $12,500. For the Barrax property, that amount is $10,530. Rovers total bond shall therefore be $23,030. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/26/2019. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the…

Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC

Filed: March 7, 2019 as 1:2018cv04289
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff: Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 FIRST MOTION to Compel Arbitration pursuant to FAA, 9 USC 3,4: Defendant AT&T's motion (Doc. 17) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to compel arbitration and stay proceedings pending the outcome of arbitrati on. It is unnecessary for the Court to reach any other grounds asserted in the motion. The parties are ordered to report to the Court on the status of the arbitration as of June 30, 2019 within 14 days thereafter. Defendant's motion (Doc. 37)…

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: February 22, 2019 as 2:2017cv01677
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/21/2019 GRANTING 42 Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to File Stipulated Dismissal. The parties are DIRECTED to file dispositional documents on or by 3/27/2019. (York, M)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: February 20, 2019 as 4:2018cv00341
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER granting 23 Motion for judgment. 15 Motion for judgment denied. Davis's complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/20/2019. (jak)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: February 20, 2019 as 4:2018cv00341
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

JUDGMENT: Davis's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/20/2019. (jak)

Alston v. AT&T Services Inc. et al

Filed: February 19, 2019 as 8:2018cv02529
Court: Maryland District Court
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc., Great Plains National Bank, Credit One Bank, N.A., First Premier Bank, Milestone Distribution, Inc., Home Point Financial Corp.
Plaintiff: Thomas Alston
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 2/19/2019. (c/m 2/19/2019 heps, Deputy Clerk)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: February 12, 2019 as 4:2018cv00341
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER partly granting and partly denying without prejudice 10 Motion to file administrative record under seal. Pages 1-514 are sealed. Pages 515-1925 will be filed on the public docket unless AT&T renews the denied part of the motion to seal, and provides specific and compelling reasons for sealing, by 2/26/2019. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/12/2019. (jak)

(PS) Clay v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3

Filed: February 8, 2019 as 2:2017cv00749
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center
Plaintiff: Jerome A. Clay
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/8/19 ORDERING that dispositive cross motions for summary judgment shall be filed by 6/28/19; any oppositions to those motions are due 7/26/19; and any reply briefs are due 8/16/19. A hearing on the cross motions for summary judgment is set for 9/12/2019, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25 before Judge Newman. (Kastilahn, A)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: January 25, 2019 as 2:2008cv00457
Court: Arizona District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER the Joint Motion for Conditional Certification of Settlement Class,Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement, and Approval of Form and Content ofNotice to Settlement Class Members 807 is GRANTED as set forth. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Joi nt Motion to Approve Amended Class ActionFairness Notice 813 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion for Approval of Amended Settlement Administrator 820 is GRANTED. A hearing (the "Final Settlement Hearing") shall be…

AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, et al.

Filed: January 15, 2019 as 2:2013cv00007
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Ed Bowlin, Connie Bowlin, Aviation Autographs, Bowlin & Associates, Inc., Law Offices of Joanna R. Mendoza, P.C., de la Pena & Holiday, LLP, Lesser Law Group, Charles E. Yeager
Plaintiff: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/14/2019 IT IS SO ORDERED 384 In light of this court's Pre-Filing Review Order, the Clerk of Court is directed to file Mrs. Yeager's supplemental motion and reply as allowed by this order upon receipt.(Reader, L)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: January 9, 2019 as 2:2017cv08106
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order, 102 (dml)

Edison Banks v. AT and T Mobility Services LLC

Filed: January 7, 2019 as 2:2017cv05191
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Mobility Services LLC, John Does
Plaintiff: Edison Banks
Nature of Suit: Other

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation to Dismissal of Entire Case With Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 101 by Judge R. Gary Klausner the Court hereby approves the Stipulation and dismisses with prejudice the Complaint by Plaintiff Edison Banks against Defendant AT and T Mobility Services LLC pursuant to FRCP Rule 41. Each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)