Thomas v. Wilson et al
Filed: September 20, 2019 as 2:2018cv00067
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Corey Wilson, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company of Arkansas, AT&T Corp, Matthew Albrecht, Rick Seawel, John Does
Plaintiff: Eddie Thomas
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
JUDGMENT: Thomas's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/20/2019. (jak)
Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al
Filed: September 18, 2019 as 2:2017cv00718
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP, T-Mobile, USA, Inc., Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Telenav, Inc.
Not Yet Classified: William Joseph Cornelius, Donald E Tiller
Plaintiff: Traxcell Technologies, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 309 SEALED MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Verizon's Experts Dr. Shoemake and Mr. Rysavy filed by Traxcell Technologies, LLC.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/18/2019. (nkl, )
(PS) Clay v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
Filed: September 17, 2019 as 2:2017cv00749
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center
Plaintiff: Jerome A. Clay
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/17/19 DIRECTING plaintiff to file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 71 Motion for Summary Judgment by 9/30/19 at 4:00 PM. Defendant may file a Reply to the Opposition by 10/24/19. The hearing remains set for 10/31/19 at 10:00 AM. (Coll, A)
Alicia Calderon v. AT and T Corp et al
Filed: September 9, 2019 as 2:2019cv03890
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Equifax, Inc., AT&T Corp, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, AT and T Corp.
Plaintiff: Alicia Calderon
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. Dkt. 20 (ake)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: August 27, 2019 as 4:2018cv00192
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Order Dismissing Case. Signed by Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/26/2019. (Stouch, L.)
County of Dorchester, South Carolina et al v. AT&T Corp et al
Filed: August 13, 2019 as 2:2018cv02890
Court: South Carolina District Court
Defendant: Bellsouth Telecommunications LLC, AT&T Corp
Plaintiff: Town of Summerville, South Carolina, County of Dorchester, South Carolina
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER AND OPINION Defendants' joint partial motion to dismiss the Complaint and to strike its class action allegations (Dkt. No. 14 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The partial motion to dismiss is denied and the motion to strike is granted. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/13/2019.(sshe, )
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: August 2, 2019 as 2:2008cv00457
Court: Arizona District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER - The Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (Doc. 837 ) is GRANTED and the Settlement is hereby approved as fair, adequate, reasonable, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class in light of the complexity, expense, and likely duration of the litigation, and the risks involved in establishing liability, damages, and in maintaining a class action through trial. On the basis of its review of the foregoing and on the presentations and other proceedings at…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: July 26, 2019 as 2:2018cv02866
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/26/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing within 14 days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and ORDERING Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 14 days of the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
Michael Terpin v. AT and T Inc et al
Filed: July 19, 2019 as 2:2018cv06975
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Mobility LLC, Does 1-25, AT and T Inc, Does 1-10
Plaintiff: Michael Terpin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 14 ; AND DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE 15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS IN PART, and DENIES IN PART, AT&Ts Motion to Dismiss and DENIES AT&Ts Motion to Strike Mr. Terpin may amend his Complaint to address the deficiencies identified above within 21 days from the date of this Order. (lc)
North Canton Board of Education v. AT&T, Inc. et al
Filed: July 3, 2019 as 5:2016cv01420
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, NCWPCS MPL 30-Year Sites Tower Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: North Canton Board of Education
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 95 ) is denied and defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 93 ) is granted. Case closed. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/3/2019. (O,K)
(PS) Bobo v. AT&T et al
Filed: June 17, 2019 as 2:2019cv00762
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: DirecTv Now, AT&T
Plaintiff: Charles Lewis Bobo
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/17/2019 IT IS SO ORDERED that all pleading, discovery and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of these F & R's. RECOMMENDING that the action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and plaintiff's failure to prosecute the case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: June 7, 2019 as 2:2018cv02866
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/6/19 GRANTING 3 Motion to Dismiss. The complaint filed 9/25/18 1 is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Within twenty-eight days from the date of this order, an amended complaint shall be filed. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Strong v. AT&T Services, Inc.
Filed: June 4, 2019 as 2:2018cv02489
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Glenna Strong
Nature of Suit: Employment
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/4/19 ORDERING that Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 3/27/2020. Discovery due by 3/20/2020. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 6/26/2020. (Kaminski, H)
Carnes v. AT&T Inc et al
Filed: May 28, 2019 as 2:2018cv01639
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc, AT&T Services Inc
Plaintiff: Robert Wayne Carnes
Nature of Suit: Employment
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Currently before the court is AT&Ts motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. (Doc. 10 ). Because Mr. Carness claims are subject to binding arbitration, the court GRANTS the motion. For the reasons explained above, the court GRANTS AT&Ts motion to compel arbitration and STAYS this proceeding. The court asks the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/28/2019. (KEK)
(PS) Bobo v. AT&T et al
Filed: May 16, 2019 as 2:2019cv00762
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: DirecTv Now, AT&T
Plaintiff: Charles Lewis Bobo
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/16/19 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. No later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Kaminski, H)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 9, 2019 as 2:2019cv01185
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 20 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 5/8/19. (jrc)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 2, 2019 as 3:2017cv00161
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING COUNSELS MOTION TO WITHDRAW (DOC. 99 ); (2) GRANTING THE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (DOC. 111 ) FOR DEFENDANT KRIEGER BEARD SERVICES, LLC TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT DIRECTV AND DIRECTSATS MOTION TO COMPEL; (3) DEFERR ING A RULING ON DEFENDANT DIRECTV AND DIRECTSATS MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 105 ); AND (3) GRANTING THE UNOPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL TO PLAINTIFFS CARPENTER, FITCH, FULLER, GALLEGOS, GARDNER, HERNANDEZ, LASECKI, MANN, MESSER AND OVERTON TO…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 29, 2019 as 6:2019cv03068
Court: Missouri Western District Court
3Rd Party Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER denying 8 : Third Party Plaintiff Ronald Hoot's Motion to Remand is DENIED.Signed on 4/29/19 by Chief District Judge Beth Phillips. (Cordell, Annette)
Jonathan Payton v. AT and T Corp. et al
Filed: April 24, 2019 as 2:2019cv01914
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: Jonathan Payton
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE PUTATIVE CLASS approved by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) 10 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 24, 2019 as 3:2018cv03248
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Order Accepting the 12 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Remand is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/24/2019) (rekc)
