Rodolfo Gonzalez Ortega v. AT and T Services, Inc. et al
Filed: December 8, 2023 as 2:2023cv08530
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Services, Inc., AT and T California, AT and T Technical Services, Inc., Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Gonzalez Ortega
Nature of Suit: Employment
MINUTES (IN CHAMBER) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND; VACATING HEARING by Judge George H Wu. Plaintiffs motion to remand is denied. The December 14, 2023, hearing set for consideration of the motion is vacated. This matter is also set for a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) scheduling conference for December 14. The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report filed by the parties (Docket No. 11), and finds it can set the schedule in this matter without hearing further statements from the…
Lopez v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: December 5, 2023 as 1:2020cv01219
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Charlene Lopez
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER VACATING ALL MATTERS AND REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/05/2023. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: All pending dates and matters are VACATED. The parties shall file dispositional documents on or before December 26, 2023. (Nguyen, J)
Simpson v. AT&T Mobility et al
Filed: November 28, 2023 as 1:2023cv01216
Court: Tennessee Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, Randel Stephenson, John Stankey
Plaintiff: Brenda-Joyce Simpson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS MOOT. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 11/28/2023. (gkp)
Douglas v. AT&T Services Inc.
Filed: October 18, 2023 as 3:2023cv00328
Court: Mississippi Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc.
Plaintiff: Debrayshia Douglas
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 ; denying 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint in this matter is dismissed with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Michael P. Mills on 10/18/23. (reg)
CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. AT&T CORPORATION
Filed: October 13, 2023 as 2:2021cv02771
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T CORPORATION, AT&T CORP.
Petitioner: AFFINITY NETWORK, INC.
Plaintiff: CORETEL WEST VIRGINIA, INC., CORETEL VIRGINIA, LLC, CORETEL NEW JERSEY, INC., CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CORETEL DELAWARE, INC.
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER THAT AT&T CORP.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. CORE'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES; ETC.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 10/13/23. 10/13/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL)
CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al v. AT&T CORPORATION
Filed: October 13, 2023 as 2:2021cv02771
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T CORPORATION, AT&T CORP.
Petitioner: AFFINITY NETWORK, INC.
Plaintiff: CORETEL WEST VIRGINIA, INC., CORETEL VIRGINIA, LLC, CORETEL NEW JERSEY, INC., CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CORETEL DELAWARE, INC.
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
MEMORANDUM; ETC.. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 10/13/23. 10/13/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL)
Forte et al v. AT&T Phones et al
Filed: October 5, 2023 as 5:2023cv00059
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Phones, Hopkinsville, KY
Plaintiff: Ronnie Joe Forte, Cecil Guye, Tyrese Wimberly, Ty'Kel Forte
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
OPINION & ORDER: The Court dismisses Tyrese Wimberly without prejudice as a Plaintiff in this action and denies as moot the motion to withdraw (DN 11 ). The Court grants the applications to proceed without prepayment of fees (DNs 2 , 7 , 9 ) and dismisses the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. cc: counsel, Plaintiffs (pro se), Defendant (JM)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 2, 2023 as 2:2019cv01837
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
AMENDED JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/29/2023 in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant in according to the 09/07/23 order in the total amount of $154,547.19. Prejudgment interest to Plaintiff in the amount of $6,630.07. Plaintiff's long-term disability coverage under the Plan is reinstated and that the Plan shall treat plaintiff from 09/01/23 going forward as if her benefits had not been terminated. (Clemente Licea, O)
Legacy Equity Advisors LLC v. AT&T Inc
Filed: September 15, 2023 as 3:2023cv00979
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc
Plaintiff: Legacy Equity Advisors LLC
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part, denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by AT&T Inc. and granting plaintiff 28 days to file a first amended complaint. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 9/15/2023) (Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
Guerrero v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: September 13, 2023 as 1:2023cv00895
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Maria Guerrero
Nature of Suit: Employment
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 9/13/2023. (Yang, Pa Gnia)
AT&T Corp. v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc.
Filed: September 6, 2023 as 1:2021cv04550
Court: New York Southern District Court
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: AT&T Corp.
Defendant: Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER granting 101 Letter Motion to Seal. Based on AT&T's letter at Dkt. 101, the motion to file and maintain the documents as redacted is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 9/6/2023) (mml)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: August 24, 2023 as 2:2023cv03747
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue re Stipulation for Protective Order 24 . See document for details. (es)
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: August 24, 2023 as 1:2023cv07351
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc., John Stankey, Randall L. Stephenson, Pascal Desroches, John Stephens
Petitioner: Velliv, Pension & Livsforsikring A/S, Bridget N. Smagala Revocable Trust U/A DTD, New Mexico State Investment Council, Suresh Kodali, Haresh Joshi, Teachers' Retirement System of the City of New York, New York City Employees' Retirement System, New York City Police Pension Fund, New York City Fire Department Pension Fund, Board of Education Retirement System of the City of New York
Plaintiff: General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER REGARDING NOTICE TO PURPORTED PLAINTIFF CLASS MEMBERS IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than September 14, 2023, Plaintiff shall advise the Court in writing of the date and manner in which it published this notice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 8/24/2023) (jca)
AT&T Corp. v. Acilis Backbone Technologies, LLC
Filed: August 24, 2023 as 1:2022cv00466
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Acilis Backbone Technologies, LLC, Acilis Telecom Holdings, LLC, Acilis Telecom Management, LLC
Plaintiff: AT&T Corp.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER Vacating Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Dustin M. Howell. (dm)
Trimble v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
Filed: August 24, 2023 as 5:2023cv00038
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff: Timothy Trimble
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
ORDER granting 7 Motion to Compel Arbitration. The parties shall submit their dispute to arbitration according to the terms of their agreement. This matter is STAYED pending arbitration. The parties shall file a status report within ninety days of this Order and each ninety days thereafter. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez on 8/24/2023. (brl)
Latimer v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
Filed: July 13, 2023 as 2:2021cv00856
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, John Does 2 - 20, DIRECTV, LLC, John Doe 1, AT&T Inc, DirecTV LLC, Does 2-20
Plaintiff: Danielle Latimer
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
MINUTE ORDER. The Court directs the Parties to provide the Court with an update regarding the current status of the arbitration proceedings, the date arbitration proceedings are expected to be concluded, and the likelihood of settlement of the remaining claims within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. Status Report due by 7/27/2023. Authorized by Judge Tana Lin. (MJV)
Craig Schmitman v. AT and T Mobility, LLC
Filed: June 27, 2023 as 2:2017cv05685
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff: Craig Schmitman
Nature of Suit: Other
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge John F. Walter. The parties are ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than July 7, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (iv)
Lopez v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: June 14, 2023 as 1:2020cv01219
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Charlene Lopez
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND TRIAL DATE signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/14/23. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' stipulated motion (ECF No. 25 ) is GRANTED, and the scheduling order is mo dified as follows: Nonexpert Discovery Deadline: August 31, 2023. Expert Disclosure Deadline: September 29, 2023. Supplemental Expert Disclosure Deadline: October 30, 2023. Expert Discovery Deadline: November 30, 2023. Dispositive…
(PS) Clewies v. AT&T et al
Filed: June 14, 2023 as 2:2023cv00834
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T, John Stankey, Jamie Burchette
Plaintiff: Darryl G. Clewies, II
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/14/2023 RECOMMENDING that this Action 1 , 4 be dismissed with prejudice; and The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
CenturyLink of Florida, Inc. et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
Filed: June 9, 2023 as 1:2022cv02206
Court: Colorado District Court
Counter Claimant: AT&T Corp., New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Counter Defendant: Central Telephone Company of Virginia, Embarq Florida, Inc., Embarq Minnesota, Inc., Embarq Missouri, Inc., Qwest Corporation, United Telephone & Telegraph Company of Indiana, United Telephone Company of Kansas, United Telephone Company of Ohio, United Telephone Company of the Northwest, Brightspeed of Virginia, LLC, CenturyLink of Florida, Inc., CenturyLink of Minnesota, Inc., Brightspeed of West Missouri, Inc., Brightspeed of Indiana, LLC., Brightspeed of Kansas, Inc., Brightspeed of Ohio, Inc.
Defendant: New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, SBC Long Distance, LLC, Teleport Communications Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Central Telephone Company of Virginia doing business as CenturyLink, Embarq Florida, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink, Embarq Missouri, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink, Embarq Minnesota, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink, United Telephone Company of Kansas doing business as CenturyLink, United Telephone & Telegraph Company of Indiana doing business as CenturyLink, United Telephone Company of Ohio doing business as CenturyLink, United Telephone Company of the Northwest doing business as CenturyLink, Qwest Corporation doing business as CenturyLink, Brightspeed of Virginia, LLC doing business as CenturyLink, CenturyLink of Florida, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink, Brightspeed of West Missouri, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink, CenturyLink of Minnesota, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink, Brightspeed of Kansas, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink, Brightspeed of Indiana, LLC. doing business as CenturyLink, Brightspeed of Ohio, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the 85 Recommendation, and the 34 Motion to Transfer is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 6/9/2023.(jtorr, )
