Lopez v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: November 4, 2022 as 1:2020cv01219
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Charlene Lopez
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND TRIAL DATE (ECF No. 19 ) signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on November 4, 2022. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the parties' stipulated motion (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED, and the sched uling order is modified as follows: Nonexpert Discovery Deadline: May 29, 2023. Expert Disclosure Deadline: June 28, 2023. Supplemental Expert Disclosure Deadline: July 28, 2023. Expert Discovery Deadline: August 25, 2023. Dispositive Motion…
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: October 6, 2022 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER GRANTING 81 Approval of the Class Notice, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/06/2022. (Maldonado, C)
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. Monroe County Board of Commissioners et al
Filed: September 30, 2022 as 3:2020cv01327
Court: Illinois Southern District Court
Defendant: Monroe County Board of Zoning Appeals, Monroe County Board of Commissioners
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER DENYING 23 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts I and III. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend its Complaint as to the timing claim under Count IV on or before October 14, 2022. (Amended Pleadings due by 10/14/2022.) The Case proceeds on Count II, and the Court will set a status conference by separate order for the purpose of discussing the next steps needed to bring this action to resolution. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/30/2022. (kss)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 30, 2022 as 2:2020cv02337
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER denying 93 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court, as set forth herein. FURTHER ORDERED that 113 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court is denied, as set forth herein. FURTHER ORDERED that 95 Motion in Limine is denied, as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Greg Gerard Guidry on 09/30/2022. (ko)
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: September 29, 2022 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement 75 , 79 signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/29/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, v. County of Santa Barbara, California
Filed: September 26, 2022 as 2:2020cv11804
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: County of Santa Barbara, California
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu. Based upon the stipulation between the parties and their respective counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and expenses. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (aco)
Mayfield v. AT&T Mobility Corporation
Filed: September 23, 2022 as 4:2022cv00735
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Corporation
Plaintiff: Matthew Blake Mayfield
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER denying 1 Motion to Proceed IFP. Mr. Mayfield has 30 days from the date of this Order to pay the full filing fee of $402.00. If Mr. Mayfield fails to pay the filing fee, his Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 9/23/2022. (jak)
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: September 21, 2022 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 75 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 09/21/2022.(Flores, E)
AT&T Corp. v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc.
Filed: September 20, 2022 as 1:2021cv04550
Court: New York Southern District Court
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: AT&T Corp.
Defendant: Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: This case has been reassigned to the undersigned. All counsel must familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jennifer-l-rochon. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines shall remain in effect notwithstanding the case's reassignment. Any conference or oral argument before or directed by the Magistrate Judge will proceed as ordered.…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 16, 2022 as 3:2017cv00556
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the Court GRANTS the motions requesting leave to file surreply and motion for leave to file supplemental authority (DE 158 , 159 ). The Court also GRANTS the Plaintiff's mo tion to seal (DE 145 ). However, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (DE 140 ). The Court also DENIES Plaintiff's motion to strike (DE 152 ) and Plaintiff's motion requesting oral argument (DE 154 ).…
Douglas v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T
Filed: September 16, 2022 as 2:2022cv10046
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Defendant: Michigan Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T
Plaintiff: Charles Douglas
Nature of Suit: Employment
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: September 14, 2022 as 1:2021cv01951
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Christopher C. Womack, AT&T Inc., Michael J Black, Kent D. Evans
Interested Party: Non-Party Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER: On September 8, 2022, the Court issued an opinion and order which, inter alia, denied the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, and stated that an order as to next steps would follow. Dkt. 281. The Court understands that a sett lement conference with Magistrate Judge Willis is scheduled for September 26, 2022. See Dkt. 277. The Court directs that, should that conference not result in settlement, the parties thereafter meet and confer and, on October 17, 2022, submit…
Securities and Exchange Commission v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: September 8, 2022 as 1:2021cv01951
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Christopher C. Womack, AT&T Inc., Michael J Black, Kent D. Evans
Interested Party: Non-Party Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
OPINION AND ORDER re: 97 MOTION in Limine (Notice of Defendants' Consolidated Daubert Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions and Testimony. filed by AT&T Inc., 90 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Liability. filed by S ecurities and Exchange Commission, 101 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Kent D. Evans, Christopher C. Womack, Michael J Black, 99 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by AT&T Inc., 88 MOTION in Limine to Str ike Testimony of…
Gavin v. AT&T Services Inc., et al.,
Filed: September 7, 2022 as 2:2020cv02246
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Diane Matayoshi, AT&T Services Inc.
Plaintiff: Victor Gavin
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER signed by Senior Judge John A. Mendez on 09/07/2022 EXTENDING the Deadlines as Follows: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/28/2022; Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures due by 11/14/2022. (Rodriguez, E)
Peerless Network, Inc. et al v. AT&T Corp.
Filed: August 26, 2022 as 1:2015cv00870
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: Peerless Network, Inc., Peerless Network of Arkansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Arizona, LLC, Peerless Network of California, LLC, Peerless Network of Colorado, LLC, Peerless Network of Connecticut, LLC, Peerless Network of Delaware, LLC, Peerless Network of the District of Columba, LLC, Peerless Network of Florida, LLC, Peerless Network of Georgia, LLC, Peerless Network of Illinois, LLC, Peerless Network of Indiana, LLC, Peerless Network of Kansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Kentucky, LLC, Peerless Network of Louisana, LLC, Peerless Network of Maine, LLC, Peerless Network of Massachusetts, LLC, Peerless Network of Michigan, LLC, Peerless Network of Minnesota, LLC, Peerless Network of Nevada, LLC, Peerless Network of New Hampshire, LLC, Peerless Network of New Jersey, LLC, Peerless Network of New York, LLC, Peerless Network of North Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Ohio, LLC, Peerless Network of Oklahoma, LLC, Peerless Network of Oregon, LLC, Peerless Network of Pennsylvania, LLC, Peerless Network of Rhode Island, LLC, Peerless Network of South Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Tennessee, LLC, Peerless Network of Utah, LLC
and others
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER REDACTED VERSION: For the foregoing reasons, the Defendant's letter motion to strike the Chart and Methodology in the Webber Declaration is DENIED. The parties are directed to provide the Court with a proposed schedule for the filing of Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs' motion to enforce the settlement agreement. That schedule should account for the additional time Defendant requires to re-engage its experts and prepare its response. Lastly, Plaintiffs are…
Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Filed: August 24, 2022 as 2:2021cv00316
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Counter Defendant: Finesse Wireless LLC
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Ericsson Inc., Nokia of America Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Michael D. Paul
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/24/2022. (nkl, )
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: August 23, 2022 as 3:2021cv01367
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting, denying 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Imran Khan, 15 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 3. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 8/23/2022) (ykp)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: August 11, 2022 as 1:2021cv01951
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Christopher C. Womack, AT&T Inc., Michael J Black, Kent D. Evans
Interested Party: Non-Party Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER: This matter was redesignated to Judge Willis on August 8, 2022. Should the parties wish to schedule a settlement conference, the Parties are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Christopher Davis via email at WillisNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov to provide three mutually agreeable dates in September. Any conference will be held in-person at Courtroom 228, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. Parties must…
Wagda et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
Filed: August 11, 2022 as 2:2019cv01057
Court: California Eastern District Court
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/10/22 EXTENDING deadlines re 61 Motion for Attorneys' Fees as follows: Plaintiff's Opposition due: 08/19/22 and Defendants' reply due 09/05/22. (Benson, A.)
Network Apps, LLC et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: August 9, 2022 as 1:2021cv00718
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T CORP., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: KYLE SCHEI, JOHN WANTZ, NETWORK APPS, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 145 Letter Motion to Seal. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the documents at docket numbers 148 and 149 under seal, visible to the Court and parties only. As to Defendants' request that the Court ta ke judicial notice of certain documents submitted in support of the motion to dismiss, the Court will address that request at the time it resolves the motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket…
