Dolby Laboratories Federal Litigation Filings

Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Unified Patents, LLC

Filed: July 6, 2023 as 23-2110
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Appellant: DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION
Appellee: UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC

LG Electronics, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filed: January 4, 2022 as 1:2022cv00042
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Dolby International AB, Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Plaintiff: LG Electronics, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Stephen Cummings v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc., et al

Filed: June 11, 2021 as 21-55612
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Defendant / Appellee: PARAMOUNT HOME ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California Corporation, LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California Corporation, PARAMOUNT PICTURES, CORP., a California Corporation, DOES, 1-50, SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California Corporation, JAMES CAMERON, DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC., a California Corporation, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORP., a California Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHEN CUMMINGS

Intertrust Technology Corporation v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Filed: October 16, 2020 as 3:2020mc80184
Court: California Northern District Court
Petitioner: Intertrust Technologies Corporation
Respondent: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Cummings v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al We have opinions for this case

Filed: May 15, 2020 as 2:2020cv04443
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Lightstorm Entertainment, Inc., Dolby Laboratories, Inc., James Cameron, -, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., Paramount Home Entertainment, Inc., Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., Paramount Pictures, Corp., James Cameron, Does 1-50
Plaintiff: Stephen Cummings
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filed: May 15, 2020 as 2:2020cv04441
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Lightstorm Entertainment, Inc., Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Paramount Home Entertainment, Inc., James Cameron, -, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., Paramount Pictures Corp., Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

Technicolor SA v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation et al

Filed: September 9, 2019 as 3:2019cv05648
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation, Dolby International AB
Plaintiff: Technicolor SA
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. v. Intertrust Technologies Corporation

Filed: June 13, 2019 as 3:2019cv03371
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Intertrust Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation et al v. Adobe Systems Incorporated We have opinions for this case

Filed: March 12, 2018 as 3:2018cv01553
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Plaintiff: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation, Dolby International AB
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

Hybrid Audio, LLC v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Filed: February 7, 2018 as 1:2018cv00222
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hybrid Audio, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

Gokhale v. Dolby Laboratories Inc et al

Filed: July 6, 2017 as 3:2017cv03845
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Jeffrey Fehervari, Conroy Shum
Plaintiff: Sushama Gokhale
Nature of Suit: Employment

GDC Technologies Limited v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Filed: April 11, 2016 as 2:2016cv02459
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: GDC Technologies Limited
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

Pantaurus, LLC v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Filed: February 5, 2016 as 2:2016cv00113
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: Pantaurus, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

United Parcel Service, Inc. et al v. Doremi Labs,Inc. et al

Filed: October 6, 2015 as 2:2015cv07840
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Dagmar Dolby, Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Doremi Labs,Inc., Doremi Technologies, LLC, Safar Ghazal, Camille Rizko, Emil Rizko
Plaintiff: United Parcel Service France S.N.C., United Parcel Service, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation This is a Justia Dockets featured case

Filed: May 18, 2012 as 4:2012cv02488
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Plaintiff: Monster Cable Products Inc
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation

Filed: November 8, 2011 as 2:2011cv02975
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Plaintiff: Monster Cable Products, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Shenzhen Newland Electronic Industry Co., Ltd et al

Filed: January 9, 2009 as 2:2009cv00059
Court: Nevada District Court
Defendant: Albert Hu, Shenzhen Newland Electronic Industry Co., Ltd
Plaintiff: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Nature of Suit: Trademark

THERASENSE V BECTON We have opinions for this case

Filed: July 21, 2008 as 08-1511
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Amicus Curiae: 1st Media, LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Alejandro Martinez, Alexander Wilson, American Bar Association, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Amy E. Hamilton, Andrea M. Castetter, Apotex Inc., Arvie J. Anderson, Association of Citizens for Patent Protection in the Public, Averie K. Hason, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Biotechnology Law Group, Boston Patent Law Association, Brian P. Barrett, Bruce A. Lehman, Carl I. Brundidge, Christian E. Mammen, Cisco Systems, Inc., Clifford H. Kraft, Attorney at Law, Conejo Valley Bar Association, Dan L. Wood, Danica Hostettler, David C. Hricik, Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Donald L. Corneglio, Jr., ECORE International, Inc., Edward J. Prein, Eisai Co. Ltd., Eisai, Inc., Elizabeth A. McGraw and others
Defendant-Appellee: Bayer HealthCare LLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Nova Biomedical Corporation
Plaintiff-Appellant: Abbott Laboratories, TheraSense, Inc. (n/k/a Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.)

LUCENT TECH V GATEWAY We have opinions for this case

Filed: July 18, 2008 as 08-1485
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Amicus Curiae: 3M Company, Apple Inc., Bank of America Corporation, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Cisco Systems, Inc., Coverity, Inc., Dolby Laboratories, Inc., E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Eli Lilly & Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, General Electric Company, Intel Corporation, InterDigital Communications, LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Micron Technology, Inc., Oracle Corporation, Palm, Inc., Qualcomm Incorporated, Regulatory DataCorp, Inc., SAP America, Inc., Symantec Corporation, Tessera Technologies, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Co., Trimble Navigation Ltd., Wyeth, Yahoo! Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant: Dell, Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: Microsoft Corporation
Oracle Corporation:
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant: Multimedia Patent Trust
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Lucent Technologies, Inc.

TAFAS V KAPPOS We have opinions for this case

Filed: May 7, 2008 as 08-1352
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Amicus Curiae: AARP, AmberWave Systems Corporation, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Arthur O. Klein, Arti K. Rai, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Computer & Communications Industry Association, Consumer Watchdog, Craig Allen Nard, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (California corporation), Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Essential Action, Fallbrook Technologies, Inc., General Electric Company, Initiative for Medicines, Access and Knowledge, Intellectual Property and Administrative Law Professors, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Intellectual Ventures, LLC, InterDigital Communications, LLC, John R. Thomas, Joseph Scott Miller, Katherine J. Strandburg, Mark A. Lemley, Mark P. McKenna, Marshall Leaffer, Michael Risch, Monsanto Company, Nano-Terra, Inc., New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Pax Streamline, Inc., Peter S. Menell, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and others
Defendant-Appellant: David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Prop, United States Patent and Trademark Office
InterDigital Communications, LLC:
Plaintiff-Appellee: Glaxo Group Limited (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham Corporation (dba GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham PLC, Triantafyllos Tafas