LUCENT TECH V GATEWAY
Filed: July 18, 2008 as 08-1485
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Amicus Curiae: 3M Company, Apple Inc., Bank of America Corporation, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Cisco Systems, Inc., Coverity, Inc., Dolby Laboratories, Inc., E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Eli Lilly & Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, General Electric Company, Intel Corporation, InterDigital Communications, LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Micron Technology, Inc., Oracle Corporation, Palm, Inc., Qualcomm Incorporated, Regulatory DataCorp, Inc., SAP America, Inc., Symantec Corporation, Tessera Technologies, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Co., Trimble Navigation Ltd., Wyeth, Yahoo! Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant: Dell, Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: Microsoft Corporation
Oracle Corporation:
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant: Multimedia Patent Trust
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Lucent Technologies, Inc.
TAFAS V KAPPOS
Filed: May 7, 2008 as 08-1352
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Amicus Curiae: AARP, AmberWave Systems Corporation, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Arthur O. Klein, Arti K. Rai, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Computer & Communications Industry Association, Consumer Watchdog, Craig Allen Nard, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (California corporation), Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Essential Action, Fallbrook Technologies, Inc., General Electric Company, Initiative for Medicines, Access and Knowledge, Intellectual Property and Administrative Law Professors, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Intellectual Ventures, LLC, InterDigital Communications, LLC, John R. Thomas, Joseph Scott Miller, Katherine J. Strandburg, Mark A. Lemley, Mark P. McKenna, Marshall Leaffer, Michael Risch, Monsanto Company, Nano-Terra, Inc., New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Pax Streamline, Inc., Peter S. Menell, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
and others
Defendant-Appellant: David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Prop, United States Patent and Trademark Office
InterDigital Communications, LLC:
Plaintiff-Appellee: Glaxo Group Limited (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham Corporation (dba GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham PLC, Triantafyllos Tafas
Harthcock v. MIPS Technologies Inc et al
Filed: November 27, 2007 as 2:2007cv00515
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Adimos Inc, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Aeroflex Incorporated, Agilent Technologies Inc, All Defendants, Arrow Electronics Inc, Asus Computer International, Atheros Communications Inc, Avnet Inc, Best Buy Co., Inc., Broadcom Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Cavium Networks Inc, Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Incorporated, Circuit City Stores Inc, Cirrus Logic Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Conexant Inc, Corelis Inc, Denso International America Inc, Dolby Laboratories Inc, Entropic Communications Inc, Epson America Inc, ESS Technology Inc, FangTek Inc, FujiFilm U.S.A. Inc, Fujitsu America Inc, GameStop Inc, Genesis Microchip (Delaware) Inc, Genesys Logic America Inc, Green Hills Software Inc, Hewlett-Packard Company
and others
Plaintiff: Jerry David Harthcock
Nature of Suit: Patent
DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
Filed: August 24, 2006 as 06-1595
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
Filed: August 15, 2006 as 06-1583
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant: Lucent Technologies Guardian I LLC
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Cooper Bauck Corp. v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al
Filed: July 25, 2006 as 3:2006cv04523
Court: California Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Patent
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Himage Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd.
Filed: January 6, 2006 as 2:2006cv00014
Court: Nevada District Court
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cooper Bauck Corp. v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al
Filed: December 15, 2005 as 1:2005cv07063
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Patent
DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
Filed: October 18, 2005 as 06-1060
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION
DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
Filed: October 4, 2005 as 06-1053
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GUARDIAN I LLC
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION, DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.
Tan v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al
Filed: September 30, 2005 as 3:2005cv03973
Court: California Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Employment
