Fortinet Federal District Court Decisions

Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.

Filed: March 27, 2013 as 5:2012cv02540
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: SRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting in part and denying in part (64) Discovery Letter Brief in case 3:12-cv-02540-JSW; granting in part and denying in part (57) Discovery Letter Brief in case 3:12-cv-03231-JSW (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: October 17, 2012 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re 165 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Fortinet, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 17, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)

Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.

Filed: September 19, 2012 as 5:2012cv02540
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: SRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING 31 STIPULATION Selecting Private ADR.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/19/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2012)

Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.

Filed: August 8, 2012 as 5:2012cv02540
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: SRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING 23 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 9/21/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/28/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 8/8/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2012)

Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.

Filed: July 16, 2012 as 5:2012cv02540
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: SRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING 17 STIPULATION TO DISMISS CERTAIN COUNTS AGAINST DEFENDANT SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/16/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)

Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.

Filed: July 12, 2012 as 5:2012cv02540
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: SRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING 14 Stipulation TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 8/24/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/31/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/11/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2012) Modified on 7/12/2012 (jjoS, COURT STAFF).

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: July 9, 2012 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 9, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: June 13, 2012 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DISMISSING ALL DEFENDANTS EXCEPT FORTINET, INC. FOR MISJOINDER UNDER FRCP 21 re 145 Order. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 13, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: June 6, 2012 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING MISJOINDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 6, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: May 9, 2012 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 135 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 7/6/11. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: January 23, 2012 as 2:2010cv00224
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., SonicWALL, Inc., WatchGuard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Considering all of the private and public interest factors, Defendants have shown that the Northern District of California is clearly more convenient than the Eastern District of Texas. Four of the § 1404(a) factors weigh in favor of transfer, and the rest are neutral or do not apply. None of the factors weigh against transfer. As such, Defendants motion to transfer venue is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/23/2012. (ch, )

Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al

Filed: January 9, 2012 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 9, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Filed: January 24, 2011 as 3:2010cv05148
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/24/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2011)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Filed: December 8, 2010 as 3:2010cv05148
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER RE: 10 REASSIGNING CASE TO JUDGE SEEBORG. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/10/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/8/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2010)

Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: August 16, 2010 as 5:2009cv00036
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Patrick R Brogan
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER 189 Setting Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions: Motion Hearing set for 10/1/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/16/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2010)

Enhanced Security Research LLC et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filed: June 25, 2010 as 1:2009cv00571
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: 3Com Corporation, Check Point Software Technologies Inc., Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Cisco Systems Inc., Fortinet Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc., SonicWALL Inc., Sourcefire Inc.
Plaintiff: Enhanced Security Research LLC, Security Research Holdings LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION re 50 MOTION to Consolidate Cases, 82 MOTION to Stay Pending Outcome of Reexamination Proceedings, and 124 MOTION to Supplement the Record re 82 MOTION to Stay Pending Outcome of Reexamination Proceedings. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 6/25/2010. (nms)

Enhanced Security Research LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filed: June 25, 2010 as 1:2009cv00390
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: 3Com Corporation, Check Point Software Technologies Inc., Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Cisco Systems Inc., Fortinet Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc., SonicWALL Inc., Sourcefire Inc.
Plaintiff: Enhanced Security Research LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION re 54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter, and MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Join a Party, 58 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter, and Motion For Failure to Join an Indispensable Party, 62 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter And Failure To Join An Indespensable Party And Joinder In Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc.'s And 3Com Corporation's Motion To Dismiss, …

Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al

Filed: June 15, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; VACATING JUNE 25, 2010 HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 15, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2010)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al

Filed: May 12, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER STAYING ACTION; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES; VACATING MAY 14, 2010 HEARING. The instant action is stayed pending the conclusion of Trend Micro Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc., Civil Case No. 1-09-C V-149262. The parties are directed to file a joint status report no later than May 13, 2011, and every six months thereafter, to inform the Court of the status of the state court proceeding. Trend Micro's motion to dismiss is denied…

Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: May 3, 2010 as 5:2009cv00036
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Patrick R Brogan
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 60 Motion to Amend/Correct Invalidity Contentions. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)