Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: April 27, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF FORTINET, INC.'S CORRECTED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 27, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: April 20, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CORRECTED COMPLAINT; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. Plaintiff shall file its Corrected Complaint no later than April 30, 2010. Unless the Court, no later than May 7, 2010, receives written notice of the parties&# 039; intent to the contrary, the Court will deem applicable to the Corrected Complaint the papers filed in support of and in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss the initial complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April…
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: April 13, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING TO JUNE 25, 2010. The hearing on defendants' motion for sanctions is continued from May 14, 2010 to June 25, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 13, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: April 13, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATED MOTION FOR ORDER (1) VACATING AND RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES, AND (2) CONTINUING LOCAL PATENT RULE DISCLOSURES. The May 28, 2010 Initial Case Management Conference and all related dates and deadlines are vacated and will be reset if the Court denies the motion to dismiss. The parties' obligations to make Patent Disclosures shall begin after the Court holds the Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney…
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: April 9, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 9, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: April 9, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
DIRECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 9, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: April 7, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER AFFORDING PARTIES OPPORTUNITY TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; CONTINUING HEARING TO MAY 14, 2010. No later than April 23, 2010, Fortinet shall file a supplemental memorandum. No later than April 30, 2010, Trend Micro shall file a supplemental reply. The hearing on Trend Micro's motion to dismiss is continued to May 14, 2010, at 9:00 a.m.Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 7, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: March 31, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 31, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)
Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al
Filed: March 31, 2010 as 5:2009cv00036
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Patrick R Brogan
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 56 unopposed motion for leave to supplement disclosure of asserted claims and infringement contentions (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: March 18, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO MAY 28, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 18, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: March 10, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL (1) PORTIONS OF MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) EXHIBIT 8 TO DECLARATION OF ANDREW C. BYRNES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS. Defendants are directed to file in the public record, no later than March 17, 2010, a redacted version of Exhibit 8. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 10, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: March 1, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 1, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: February 19, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH CLERK'S JANUARY 19, 2010 NOTICE; DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 19, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2010)
Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al
Filed: February 12, 2010 as 5:2009cv00036
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Patrick R Brogan
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER 49 of Continuance of Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 2/12/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated
Filed: February 9, 2010 as 3:2008cv05371
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
RELATED CASE ORDER. Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated, Case No. 08-5371 MMC, is related to Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated, et al., Case No. 10-0048 EDL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 9, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2010)
Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated et al
Filed: February 9, 2010 as 3:2010cv00048
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Trend Micro Incorporated
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
RELATED CASE ORDER. Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated, Case No. 08-5371 MMC, is related to Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated, et al., Case No. 10-0048 EDL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 9, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2010)
Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al
Filed: January 21, 2010 as 5:2009cv00036
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Patrick R Brogan
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER. Signed by Judge Laporte on 1/21/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2010)
Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al
Filed: January 21, 2010 as 5:2009cv00036
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Patrick R Brogan
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER 37 for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/21/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2010)
Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al
Filed: January 21, 2010 as 5:2009cv00036
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Patrick R Brogan
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER 40 for Withdrawal of Farella Braun & Martel LLP as Co-Counsel for Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc., Attorney Roderick Manley Thompson; Brian Joseph Keating and Noel Andrew Leibnitz terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/21/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2010)
Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al
Filed: December 31, 2009 as 5:2009cv00036
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Patrick R Brogan
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re 34 Parties' Proposed Form of Protective Order. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 12/31/2009)
