Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: April 19, 2012 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 19, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2012)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: March 26, 2012 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO PATEN L.R. 4-2. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 26, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2012)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: March 12, 2012 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AGAINST INTEL CORPORATION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 12, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: March 6, 2012 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ISSI TO SERVE P.R. 3-3 INVALIDITY CONTETIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 6, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: February 1, 2012 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER FOR STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AS TO INTEL CORPORATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 1, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2012)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: January 11, 2012 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AGAINST ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. WITH PREJUDICE. Goodman's claims against Elpida are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 11, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: November 18, 2011 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/18/11. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2011)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: November 4, 2011 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER FOR STIPULATED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 4, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: November 2, 2011 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 2, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: September 16, 2011 as 3:2011cv02607
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Elpida Memory, Inc., Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions Inc., Eon Silicon Solutions Inc., Fidelix Co., Ltd., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: James B. Goodman
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO LODGE CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 16, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
Filed: April 5, 2010 as M:2007cv01819
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, Crucial Technology, Inc., Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., Epson America, Inc., Epson Electronics America Inc., Etron Technology America, Inc., Etron Technology, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., GSI Technology Inc, Hitachi America Ltd, Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor , Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Integrated Silicon Solution Inc, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mosel Vitelic Corporation, Mosel Vitelic Inc., NEC Electronics America Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, Renesas Technology America, Inc., Renesas Technology Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Samsung Electronics Company Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor Inc.
and others
Intervenor: United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff: Alec Berezin, Alexander Ma, Alfred Livingston, Allen Nassiff, Andrew Ditton, Arthur Madsen, Autotime Corporation, Bekah Zietz, Blaine Olson, Bradley Chase, Brian Kreitzer, Brittany Chung, Bruce Sullivan, Cade Oyadomori, Candace Rowlette, Carlos R. Carrillo, Catherine L. Morgan, Chad Klebs, Chip-Tech, Ltd., Christopher C. Crawford, Christopher J. Stawski, Craig Friedson, Craig Sparks, Cristi Ferguson, Dan Rempe, Daniel Price, Daniel Yohalem, Dataplex, Inc., David Loomis, David Perez, David Reedy, David Takeda
and others
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
ORDER re 980 Granting Stipulation Amending Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs' Proposed Forms of Notice Regarding Class Action and Partial Settlements.Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 04/05/2010. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2010) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/5/2010: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B) (scc, COURT STAFF).
