McAboy v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: May 13, 2022
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv01773
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, ECF 5 , is GRANTED. See attached Opinion and Order for additional details. Ordered by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy)
INTEL CORPORATION v. XMTT, INC.
Filed: April 19, 2022
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 21-2127
MICHAEL BRUZZONE V. INTEL CORPORATION
Filed: March 24, 2022
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 21-16108
INTEL CORPORATION v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Filed: March 24, 2022
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-2239
INTEL CORPORATION v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Filed: March 24, 2022
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-2240
INTEL CORPORATION v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Filed: March 24, 2022
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-2092
Gilman v. Intel Corporation
Filed: January 26, 2022
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv00193
Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS IN PART Intel's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (ECF 213 ). The Court dismisses with prejudice all claims except those alleged by Plaintiffs Carlo Garcia, Joseph Phillips, Kenneth Woolsey, Ci ty of New Castle, James Bradshaw, Andrew Montoya, and Kathleen Greer for alleged conduct by Intel occurring on or after September 1, 2017. The Court also dismisses the claims of these seven Plaintiffs other than: (a) their nationwide claim…
(PS)Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation
Filed: January 11, 2022
State: California
Court: California Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv01539
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/2022 ADOPTING 17 Findings and Recommendations in full, GRANTING 6 Motion to Dismiss, DISMISSING 1 Complaint without leave to amend, and GRANTING 7 Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexati ous Litigant. Plaintiff is DECLARED a vexatious litigant and must submit for pre-filing review any pro se complaint to be filed in the Eastern District of California against Intel Corporation. The Court ISSUES the following pre-filing order: Any futu re…
Intel Corp. v. Qualcomm, Inc.
Filed: December 28, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1828
INTEL CORPORATION v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Filed: December 28, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1664
Health Discovery Corporation v. Intel Corporation
Filed: December 27, 2021
State: Texas
Court: Texas Western District Court
Case Number: 6:2020cv00666
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 12 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jc5)
(PS)Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation
Filed: November 15, 2021
State: California
Court: California Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv01539
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/15/21 ORDERING that defendant's 9 request for judicial notice is GRANTED. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendant's 6 motion to dismiss be GRANT ED and plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED without leave to amend; Defendant's 7 motion to declare plaintiff to be a vexatious litigant be GRANTED; and Plaintiff be declared a vexatious litigant and ordered to submit for pre-filing revie w any…
37Celsius Capital Partners LP et al v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: October 18, 2021
State: Wisconsin
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2020cv00621
DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 10/18/2021. The defendants' motion for a ruling that plaintiffs are not entitled to claim damages for "Lost Profits and Value from the Lost Acquisition of Care" is GRANTED. (ECF No. 24 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to seal confidential documents (ECF No. 34 ) is also GRANTED. ECF No. 35-2 shall be unsealed and publicly filed. (cc: all counsel)(mlm)
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED v. INTEL CORPORATION
Filed: October 13, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1587
Intel Corporation v. Fortress Investment Group, LLC, et al.
Filed: September 30, 2021
State: Delaware
Court: Court of Chancery
Case Number: C.A. No. 2021-0021-MTZ
In Re INTEL CORPORATION
Filed: September 27, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 21-168
Ollodart v. Intel Corporation
Filed: September 11, 2021
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv00125
Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated above, I GRANT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF 33]. Because Ollodart was previously given leave to amend his claims and has again failed to conform his complaint to pleading standards, his claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed on 9/11/2021 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
Anderson v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee et al
Filed: August 26, 2021
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 5:2019cv04618
Order granting 131 Joint Proposed Protective Order as Modified by the Court. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 8/26/2021. (svklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2021)
Qualcomm Inc. v. Intel Corp.
Filed: July 27, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1589
FLASH-CONTROL, LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION
Filed: July 14, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-2141
