(PS) Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation
Filed: February 13, 2020
State: California
Court: California Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00865
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/12/20 ADOPTING 51 Findings and Recommendations, GRANTING Motions to Dismiss 26 , 34 . The April 30, 2019 second amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. DENYING Motions to declare plaintiff vexatious 28 , 35 and DENYING Motions to Proceed IFP 2 , 33 . CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)
(PS) Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation
Filed: December 17, 2019
State: California
Court: California Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00865
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/16/19 RECOMMENDING that 26 Motion to Dismiss and 34 Motion to Dismiss be granted. 28 Motion to declare plaintiff vexatious and 35 Motion to declare plaintiff vexatious be denied. 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and 33 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be denied. This action be closed. F&R referred to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
R2 SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. v. INTEL CORPORATION
Filed: November 13, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-1031
X2Y ATTENUATORS, LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION
Filed: October 4, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-2248
Tabaian et al v. Intel Corporation
Filed: September 10, 2019
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv00326
OPINION & ORDER: This Opinion & Order resolves the eight claim construction disputes. Signed on 9/10/2019 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
Provencio v. Intel Corporation
Filed: April 30, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Case Number: 18-2090
Tabaian et al v. Intel Corporation
Filed: March 29, 2019
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv00326
OPINION & ORDER Defendants Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Identify the Infringement Theories they Intend to Pursue 101 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement 121 is DENIED. Defendants Motion to Strike 127 is DENIED as moot. The Cour t directs Plaintiffs to limit their infringement contentions to no more than 4 within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Plaintiffs must select their contentions from their November 2018 Summary Infringement Chart. Signed on 3/29/2019 by Judge Marco A.…
VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation
Filed: March 26, 2019
State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv00966
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/26/2019. (nmf)
Alsadi v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: February 26, 2019
State: Arizona
Court: Arizona District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv03738
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 100 Motion to Strike. ORDERED denying Plaintiffs' 117 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Intel's 104 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 2/25/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
Intel Corporation v. Rivers
Filed: February 19, 2019
State: California
Court: California Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv03061
ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/14/19. (Kaminski, H)
Continental Circuits LLC v. Intel Corp.
Filed: February 8, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-1076
Sulyma v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee
Filed: November 28, 2018
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 17-15864
Employee Retirement Income Security Act The panel reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in an ERISA action on the ground that the limitations period had expired. A former employee and participant in Intel’s retirement plans sued the company for allegedly investing retirement funds in violation of ERISA section 1104. The district court concluded that the employee had the requisite “actual knowledge” to trigger…
VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation
Filed: October 29, 2018
State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv00966
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/29/2018. (fms)
Intel Corporation v. Tela Innovations, Inc.
Filed: October 5, 2018
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv02848
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 43 MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William H. Orrick also denying 42 , 53 , 57 , 67 Administrative Motions to File Under Seal. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2018)
Tabaian et al v. Intel Corporation
Filed: September 22, 2018
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv00326
OPINION: Regarding disqualification of Plaintiff's expert Mike Walters. Signed on 9/22/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
Intel Corporation v. Tela Innovations, Inc.
Filed: September 18, 2018
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv02848
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 28 MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S AND DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO SEAL Judge William H. Orrick. 44 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply is granted. 28 , 33 , 39 Administrative Motions to File Under Seal denied with leave to amend. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2018)
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Intel Corporation
Filed: September 13, 2018
State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2017cv00676
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/12/2018. (nkl, )
Provencio v. Intel Corporation
Filed: May 17, 2018
State: New Mexico
Court: New Mexico District Court
Case Number: 1:2016cv01268
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera granting 30 Defendant Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment. (baw)
Webb v. Intel Corporation
Filed: March 29, 2018
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2017cv01089
Opinion and Order - Plaintiff has stated a claim for interference under the FMLA and for wrongful discharge under Oregon law. Accordingly, Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss (ECF 11 ) is DENIED. Signed on 3/29/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
Continental Circuits LLC v. Intel Corporation et al
Filed: June 19, 2017
State: Arizona
Court: Arizona District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv02026
ORDER granting/denying in part 142 (redacted version), 147 (sealed version) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to State a Claim. The motion is granted as to Plaintiff's (a) direct infringement claims against Ibiden as to unna med products sold to customers other than Intel, (b) indirect infringement claims related to the unnamed Ibiden products intended for customers other than Intel, and (c) willfulness claims against both Defendants. The motion is denied as to…
