Lam Research Federal Litigation Filings

In Re: Elaine Duke

Filed: October 19, 2017 as 17-3345
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts, City of Cambridge, Massachusetts, City of Chelsea, Massachusetts, City of Chicago, Illinois, Cook County, Illinois, City of Honolulu, Hawaii, County of Honolulu, Hawaii, City of Houston, Texas, County of Los Angeles, California, City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, City of New York, City of Oakland, California, City of Philadelphia, City of Portland, Oregon, City of Providence, Rhode Island, City of Rochester, New York, City of Sacramento, California, City of San Francisco, California, County of San Francisco, California, County of Santa Clara, California, City of Santa Monica, California, City of Seattle, Washington, City of Somerville, Massachusetts, City of Tucson, Arizona, City of West Hollywood, California, United States Conference of Mayors
Movant: 6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated, AdRoll, Inc., Affirm, Inc., Airbnb, Inc., Alation Inc., Ampush LLC, Appboy, AppNexus Inc., Asana, Inc., Atlassian Corporation Plc., Azavea, Bigtooth Ventures, Box Inc., Brightcove Inc., Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., BSA The Software Alliance, CareZone Inc., Carto, Casper Sleep, Inc., Castlight Health, Inc., Cavium, Chegg Inc., Chobani, LLC, Civis Analytics, Citrix Systems, Inc., ClassPass, Inc., Cloudera, Inc., Cloudflare, Inc., Codecademy, Color Genomics, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States of America
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon, Eliana Fernandez, Carlos Vargas, Mariano Mondragon, Carolina Fung Feng, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Hawaii, State of Illinois, State of Iowa, State of New Mexico, State of North Carolina, State of Oregon, State of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Virginia, State of Colorado
Nature of Suit: Other

CIGNEX Datamatics, Inc. v. Lam Research Corporation

Filed: March 24, 2017 as 1:2017cv00320
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Lam Research Corporation
Plaintiff: CIGNEX Datamatics, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Lam Research Corporation v. Flamm

Filed: March 18, 2015 as 4:2015cv01277
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Daniel L. Flamm
Plaintiff: Lam Research Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

B-M et al v. LAM Research Corporation

Filed: October 15, 2013 as 2:2013cv02118
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: LAM Research Corporation
Plaintiff: Kelsey B-M, Janelle Weispfenning
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Tessitore v. Novellus Systems, Inc. et al

Filed: February 17, 2012 as 4:2012cv00792
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Ann D. Rhoads, Delbert Whitaker, Glen G. Possley, Krishna Saraswat, Lam Research Corporation, Neil R. Bonke, Novellus Systems, Inc., Richard S. Hill, William R. Spivey, Yoshio Nishi, Youssef A. El-Mansy
Plaintiff: James Tessitore
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

Nagpal v. Hill et al

Filed: January 6, 2012 as 5:2012cv00126
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Ann D Rhoads, BLMS, Inc, Delbert Whitaker, Glen G Possley, Krishna Saraswat, Lam Research Corporation, Neil R. Bonke, Richard S. Hill, William R. Spivey, Yoshio Nishi, Youssef A El-Mansy
Plaintiff: Sunil Nagpal
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

Nagpal v. Hill et al

Filed: January 6, 2012 as 3:2012cv00126
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Ann D Rhoads, BLMS, Inc, Delbert Whitaker, Glen G Possley, Krishna Saraswat, Lam Research Corporation, Neil R. Bonke, Richard S. Hill, William R. Spivey, Yoshio Nishi, Youssef A El-Mansy
Plaintiff: Sunil Nagpal
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

Aspect Systems, Inc. v. Lam Research Corp.

Filed: July 28, 2009 as 09-16584
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: LAM RESEARCH CORP., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: ASPECT SYSTEMS, INC., an Arizona corporation

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: July 24, 2009 as 3:2009cv03399
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

Aspect Systems, Inc. v. Lam Research Corp. We have opinions for this case

Filed: July 15, 2009 as 09-16486
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: LAM RESEARCH CORP., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: ASPECT SYSTEMS, INC., an Arizona corporation

Lam Research Corporation v. Verity Instruments, Inc.

Filed: November 15, 2006 as 3:2006cv07088
Court: California Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Patent

Lam Research Corporation v. Verity Instruments Inc.

Filed: June 27, 2006 as 5:2006cv03986
Court: California Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Patent

Aspect Systems Inc v. Lam Research Corp.

Filed: June 26, 2006 as 2:2006cv01620
Court: Arizona District Court
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Lam Research Corporation v. Deshmukh

Filed: October 11, 2005 as 5:2005mc80229
Court: California Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes

Lam Research Corporation v. Deshmukh

Filed: July 23, 2004 as 3:2004cv05435
Court: Washington Western District Court
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Lam Research Corporation v. Schunk Semiconductor et al

Filed: March 27, 2003 as 3:2003cv01335
Court: California Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Patent

Verity Instruments v. Lam Research

Filed: October 19, 2001 as 4:2001cv00321
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Nature of Suit: Patent