Rumph v. Lam Research Corporation et al
Filed: April 11, 2024 as 3:2024cv00630
Court: Oregon District Court
Defendant: Lam Research Corporation, Sean Pasin
Plaintiff: Jason Rumph
Nature of Suit: Employment
Rumph v. Lam Research Corporation et al
Filed: April 11, 2024 as 3:2024cv00628
Court: Oregon District Court
Defendant: Lam Research Corporation, Sean Pasin
Plaintiff: Jason Rumph
Nature of Suit: Employment
Lam Research Corporation v. Cross et al
Filed: April 24, 2023 as 3:2023cv00859
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Robert Cross, JTM Technologies Inc
Plaintiff: Lam Research Corporation
Turner et al v. Lam Research Corporation
Filed: April 20, 2023 as 1:2023cv00435
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Lam Research Corporation
Plaintiff: Gary T. Turner, Ana Maria Turner
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Turner et al v. Lam Research Corporation
Filed: November 23, 2022 as 1:2022cv01237
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Lam Research Corporation
Plaintiff: Gary T. Turner, Ana Maria Turner
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
CIGNEX Datamatics Inc v. LAM Research Corp
Filed: November 4, 2022 as 22-3037
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Defendant / Appellee: LAM RESEARCH CORP
Plaintiff / Appellant: CIGNEX DATAMATICS INC
Inpria Corporation v. Lam Research Corp.
Filed: October 14, 2022 as 1:2022cv01359
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Lam Research Corp.
Plaintiff: Inpria Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
CIGNEX Datamatics Inc v. LAM Research Corp
Filed: June 4, 2020 as 20-2121
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Defendant / Appellant: LAM RESEARCH CORP
Plaintiff / Appellee: CIGNEX DATAMATICS INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 19, 2018 as 3:2018cv02195
Court: Oregon District Court
Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: July 3, 2018 as 2:2018cv02087
Court: Arizona District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
In Re: Elaine Duke
Filed: October 19, 2017 as 17-3345
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts, City of Cambridge, Massachusetts, City of Chelsea, Massachusetts, City of Chicago, Illinois, Cook County, Illinois, City of Honolulu, Hawaii, County of Honolulu, Hawaii, City of Houston, Texas, County of Los Angeles, California, City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, City of New York, City of Oakland, California, City of Philadelphia, City of Portland, Oregon, City of Providence, Rhode Island, City of Rochester, New York, City of Sacramento, California, City of San Francisco, California, County of San Francisco, California, County of Santa Clara, California, City of Santa Monica, California, City of Seattle, Washington, City of Somerville, Massachusetts, City of Tucson, Arizona, City of West Hollywood, California, United States Conference of Mayors
Movant: 6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated, AdRoll, Inc., Affirm, Inc., Airbnb, Inc., Alation Inc., Ampush LLC, Appboy, AppNexus Inc., Asana, Inc., Atlassian Corporation Plc., Azavea, Bigtooth Ventures, Box Inc., Brightcove Inc., Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., BSA The Software Alliance, CareZone Inc., Carto, Casper Sleep, Inc., Castlight Health, Inc., Cavium, Chegg Inc., Chobani, LLC, Civis Analytics, Citrix Systems, Inc., ClassPass, Inc., Cloudera, Inc., Cloudflare, Inc., Codecademy, Color Genomics, Inc.
and others
Petitioner: Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States of America
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon, Eliana Fernandez, Carlos Vargas, Mariano Mondragon, Carolina Fung Feng, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated individuals, State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Hawaii, State of Illinois, State of Iowa, State of New Mexico, State of North Carolina, State of Oregon, State of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Virginia, State of Colorado
Nature of Suit: Other
CIGNEX Datamatics, Inc. v. Lam Research Corporation
Filed: March 24, 2017 as 1:2017cv00320
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Lam Research Corporation
Plaintiff: CIGNEX Datamatics, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Lam Research Corporation v. Flamm
Filed: March 18, 2015 as 4:2015cv01277
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Daniel L. Flamm
Plaintiff: Lam Research Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
B-M et al v. LAM Research Corporation
Filed: October 15, 2013 as 2:2013cv02118
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: LAM Research Corporation
Plaintiff: Kelsey B-M, Janelle Weispfenning
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Tessitore v. Novellus Systems, Inc. et al
Filed: February 17, 2012 as 4:2012cv00792
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Ann D. Rhoads, Delbert Whitaker, Glen G. Possley, Krishna Saraswat, Lam Research Corporation, Neil R. Bonke, Novellus Systems, Inc., Richard S. Hill, William R. Spivey, Yoshio Nishi, Youssef A. El-Mansy
Plaintiff: James Tessitore
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Nagpal v. Hill et al
Filed: January 6, 2012 as 3:2012cv00126
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Ann D Rhoads, BLMS, Inc, Delbert Whitaker, Glen G Possley, Krishna Saraswat, Lam Research Corporation, Neil R. Bonke, Richard S. Hill, William R. Spivey, Yoshio Nishi, Youssef A El-Mansy
Plaintiff: Sunil Nagpal
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Nagpal v. Hill et al
Filed: January 6, 2012 as 5:2012cv00126
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Ann D Rhoads, BLMS, Inc, Delbert Whitaker, Glen G Possley, Krishna Saraswat, Lam Research Corporation, Neil R. Bonke, Richard S. Hill, William R. Spivey, Yoshio Nishi, Youssef A El-Mansy
Plaintiff: Sunil Nagpal
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Aspect Systems, Inc. v. Lam Research Corp.
Filed: July 28, 2009 as 09-16584
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: LAM RESEARCH CORP., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: ASPECT SYSTEMS, INC., an Arizona corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: July 24, 2009 as 3:2009cv03399
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Aspect Systems, Inc. v. Lam Research Corp.
Filed: July 15, 2009 as 09-16486
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: LAM RESEARCH CORP., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: ASPECT SYSTEMS, INC., an Arizona corporation
