Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: April 7, 2010 as 3:2009cv05633
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Implicit Networks, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2010)
Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Sybase, Inc. et al
Filed: April 7, 2010 as 3:2009cv01478
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Sybase, Inc.
Plaintiff: Implicit Networks, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2010)
Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: April 5, 2010 as 4:2009cv01224
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Backweb Technologies, Ltd
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re 86 Granting STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DATE FOR THE ADR SESSION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 04/05/2010. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2010)
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
Filed: April 5, 2010 as 2:2007cv00432
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Counter Defendant: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 339 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Bill of Costs and Motions for Exceptional Case, Attorney Fees and Cost shall be due 4/8/2010. Signed by Judge Randall R. Rader on 4/5/2010. (ch, )
Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al
Filed: March 31, 2010 as 8:2008cv00537
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Research in Motion, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 160 Motion to Extend. 1) Defendants motion is granted; defendant shall have until April 29, 2010, to amend its pleadings to allege thedefense of inequitable conduct. 2) Defendant shall have until April 9, 2010, to file a surreply claim construction brief. 3) The discovery deadline for completion of fact discovery is extended to May 28, 2010. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (PCV, )
Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: March 26, 2010 as 4:2009cv01224
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Backweb Technologies, Ltd
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re 86 granting STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DATE FOR THE ADR SESSION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 03/26/2010. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2010)
Estavillo v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: March 26, 2010 as 5:2009cv05485
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Nintendo of America, Incorporated
Plaintiff: Erik Estavillo
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
ORDER re 4 Deeming Motion to Dismiss to Be Notice of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Signed by Judge Patricia V Trumbull on 3/25/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 3/26/2010)
Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: March 25, 2010 as 4:2009cv01224
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Backweb Technologies, Ltd
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re 84 granting STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF SYMANTEC CORPORATION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 03/25/2010. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2010)
Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al
Filed: March 24, 2010 as 8:2008cv00537
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Research in Motion, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 119 Motion for Leave to amend it's asserted claims and infringement contentions. Prism's 141 Motion to file under Seal is granted. RIMs oral motion for leave to take three additional depositions to addres s prior art and/or clarification of, and the factual basis for, Prisms amended infringement contentions is granted; and RIMs oral motion to amend certain case deadlines is granted as set forth within the order. The parties may present a…
Arendi Holding Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: March 22, 2010 as 1:2009cv00119
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Dell Inc., Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Arendi Holding Ltd.
Nature of Suit: Patent
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT re 132 MOTION for Summary Judgment That Arendi Is Not Entitled To Provisional Damages Pursuant To 35 U.S.C. § 154(D), filed by Microsoft Corporation, Dell Inc.. Please note that when filing Objections pursua nt to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with…
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
Filed: March 22, 2010 as 2:2007cv00432
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Counter Defendant: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
FINAL JUDGMENT - ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on all of Plaintiffs claims; Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Defendants counterclaim for declaratory judgment of non-infringement; Defendants have not and are not infringing any claim of U.S. Patent No. 6,978,253; Defendants counterclaims for declaratory judgment of invalidity and unenforceability are dismissed without prejudice; The date of entry of this Final Judgment shall be the date…
Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al
Filed: March 22, 2010 as 8:2008cv00537
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Research in Motion, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 152 Motion to Extend. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion is granted; plaintiff shall have until March 22, 2010, to file its replybrief in support of its initial claim construction brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (PCV, )
Odom v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: March 19, 2010 as 3:2009cv00230
Court: Oregon District Court
Counter Claimant: Microsoft Corporation
Counter Defendant: Gary Odom
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Gary Odom
Nature of Suit: Patent
Opinion And Order. Mr. Odom's Motion for Stay is DENIED. Signed on 3/9/10 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (cib)
Microsoft Corporation v. TiVo, Inc.
Filed: March 18, 2010 as 5:2010cv00240
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 10 TO ADJUST CASE MANAGEMENT DATES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 03/18/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2010)
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
Filed: March 18, 2010 as 2:2007cv00432
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Counter Defendant: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER - granting 253 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgement. Summary judgment of non-infringement as to all asserted claims is therefore GRANTED. The parties are requested to file a joint statement by 3/19/2010, @ 5:00 pm, identifying any remaining issues in the case in light of summary judgment order. Signed by Judge Randall R. Rader on 3/17/2010. (ch, )
Microsoft Corporation v. Sweeney et al
Filed: March 15, 2010 as 6:2008cv01218
Court: Oregon District Court
Defendant: Debra Sweeney, Vincent Sweeney
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER: Granting Stipulated Motion for a Permanent Injunction 27 . Signed on March 15, 2010 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (cp) Modified on 3/18/2010 to correct typo(lae).
Microsoft Corporation v. Royal Distribution, Inc. et al
Filed: March 12, 2010 as 1:2009cv02807
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Katrina Snowden, Royal Distribution, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
MINUTE ORDER granting 31 Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order. Stipulated Protective Order is approved and made an Order of Court, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/12/2010.(mjwcd)
Microsoft Corporation v. Royal Distribution, Inc. et al
Filed: March 12, 2010 as 1:2009cv02807
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Katrina Snowden, Royal Distribution, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/12/2010. (mjwcd)
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
Filed: March 5, 2010 as 2:2007cv00432
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Counter Defendant: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 331 Unopposed Motion Regarding Deadlines. Motions in limine shall be due 3/15/2010., Replies to Daubert Motions shall be due 3/22/2010. Signed by Judge Randall R. Rader on 3/5/2010. (ch, )
Microsoft Corporation v. VioSoftware Corporation et al
Filed: March 5, 2010 as 1:2009cv02809
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: VioSoftware Corporation, Warren Do
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER. Four (4) day Jury Trial set for 12/13/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 11/19/2010 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/5/10. (rebsec, )
