Microsoft Federal District Court Decisions

Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al

Filed: March 24, 2010 as 8:2008cv00537
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Research in Motion, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 119 Motion for Leave to amend it's asserted claims and infringement contentions. Prism's 141 Motion to file under Seal is granted. RIMs oral motion for leave to take three additional depositions to addres s prior art and/or clarification of, and the factual basis for, Prisms amended infringement contentions is granted; and RIMs oral motion to amend certain case deadlines is granted as set forth within the order. The parties may present a…

Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al

Filed: March 22, 2010 as 8:2008cv00537
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Research in Motion, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER granting 152 Motion to Extend. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion is granted; plaintiff shall have until March 22, 2010, to file its replybrief in support of its initial claim construction brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (PCV, )

Arendi Holding Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filed: March 22, 2010 as 1:2009cv00119
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Dell Inc., Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Arendi Holding Ltd.
Nature of Suit: Patent

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT re 132 MOTION for Summary Judgment That Arendi Is Not Entitled To Provisional Damages Pursuant To 35 U.S.C. § 154(D), filed by Microsoft Corporation, Dell Inc.. Please note that when filing Objections pursua nt to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with…

Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filed: March 22, 2010 as 2:2007cv00432
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Counter Defendant: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

FINAL JUDGMENT - ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on all of Plaintiffs claims; Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Defendants counterclaim for declaratory judgment of non-infringement; Defendants have not and are not infringing any claim of U.S. Patent No. 6,978,253; Defendants counterclaims for declaratory judgment of invalidity and unenforceability are dismissed without prejudice; The date of entry of this Final Judgment shall be the date…

Odom v. Microsoft Corporation

Filed: March 19, 2010 as 3:2009cv00230
Court: Oregon District Court
Counter Claimant: Microsoft Corporation
Counter Defendant: Gary Odom
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Gary Odom
Nature of Suit: Patent

Opinion And Order. Mr. Odom's Motion for Stay is DENIED. Signed on 3/9/10 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (cib)

Microsoft Corporation v. TiVo, Inc.

Filed: March 18, 2010 as 5:2010cv00240
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 10 TO ADJUST CASE MANAGEMENT DATES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 03/18/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2010)

Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filed: March 18, 2010 as 2:2007cv00432
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Counter Defendant: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER - granting 253 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgement. Summary judgment of non-infringement as to all asserted claims is therefore GRANTED. The parties are requested to file a joint statement by 3/19/2010, @ 5:00 pm, identifying any remaining issues in the case in light of summary judgment order. Signed by Judge Randall R. Rader on 3/17/2010. (ch, )

Microsoft Corporation v. Sweeney et al

Filed: March 15, 2010 as 6:2008cv01218
Court: Oregon District Court
Defendant: Debra Sweeney, Vincent Sweeney
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

ORDER: Granting Stipulated Motion for a Permanent Injunction 27 . Signed on March 15, 2010 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (cp) Modified on 3/18/2010 to correct typo(lae).

Microsoft Corporation v. Royal Distribution, Inc. et al

Filed: March 12, 2010 as 1:2009cv02807
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Katrina Snowden, Royal Distribution, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

MINUTE ORDER granting 31 Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order. Stipulated Protective Order is approved and made an Order of Court, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/12/2010.(mjwcd)

Microsoft Corporation v. Royal Distribution, Inc. et al

Filed: March 12, 2010 as 1:2009cv02807
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Katrina Snowden, Royal Distribution, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/12/2010. (mjwcd)

Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filed: March 5, 2010 as 2:2007cv00432
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Counter Defendant: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER granting 331 Unopposed Motion Regarding Deadlines. Motions in limine shall be due 3/15/2010., Replies to Daubert Motions shall be due 3/22/2010. Signed by Judge Randall R. Rader on 3/5/2010. (ch, )

Microsoft Corporation v. VioSoftware Corporation et al

Filed: March 5, 2010 as 1:2009cv02809
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: VioSoftware Corporation, Warren Do
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER. Four (4) day Jury Trial set for 12/13/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Trial Preparation Conference set for 11/19/2010 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/5/10. (rebsec, )

Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al

Filed: March 1, 2010 as 8:2008cv00537
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Research in Motion, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER - Plaintiff's motion to strike 137 is granted; Filing 135 is stricken without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (KBJ)

Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Microsoft Corporation

Filed: February 23, 2010 as 4:2009cv01224
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Backweb Technologies, Ltd
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER re 81 granting STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND CERTAIN DATES RELATING TO CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/23/10. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2010)

Alvarado v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filed: February 22, 2010 as 2:2009cv00189
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Emma Alvarado
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

ORDER granting 40 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's second amended complaint, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(MD)

Suzlon Energy LTD v. Microsoft Corp

Filed: February 22, 2010 as 2:2010cv00170
Court: Washington Western District Court
Petitioner: Suzlon Energy LTD
Respondent: Microsoft Corp
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

ORDER: Because Petitioners surreply (Dkt. No. 13) does not conform to the requirements of Local Rule 7(g), the Court STRIKES the submission. The Court shall not consider Petitioners surreply while reaching a decision on Respondents motion to quash, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RK)

Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al

Filed: February 22, 2010 as 8:2008cv00537
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Research in Motion, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER; granting 131 Motion to Withdraw Document. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file plaintiff's amended disclosure of asserted claims and preliminary infringement contentions and Exhibit A thereto under seal 118 is deemed withdrawn. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAE)

Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filed: February 18, 2010 as 2:2007cv00432
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Counter Defendant: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Defendant: A9.com, Inc., AOL LLC, Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Performance Pricing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER - granting 315 Joint Motion Regarding Pretrial Deadlines and Trial. Motions due by 3/5/2010., Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/11/2010. All other deadlines are set forth herein. Signed by Judge Randall R. Rader on 2/18/2010. (ch, )

Prism Technologies v. Research in Motion, Ltd. et al

Filed: February 18, 2010 as 8:2008cv00537
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Research in Motion, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER striking 124 Objection. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion 127 is granted; Filing No. 124 is stricken without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (PCV, ) Modified on 2/18/2010 to reflect that Objection 124 is stricken, not granted. (PCV, ).

Microsoft Corp v. Does 1-10 et al

Filed: February 18, 2010 as 3:2010cv00162
Court: Connecticut District Court
Defendant: certinside.com, certinside.net, certinside.org, exam4cert.biz, exam4cert.com, exam4cert.net, exam4cert.org, John Does 1-10, pass4side.com, pass4side.net, testinside.co.uk, testinside.com, testinside.net, testinside.org, testinside.us, testinside.ws
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corp
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Freezing the Defendant's Financial Accounts and Assets. The Plaintiff shall promptly serve a copy of this order upon the Defendants. See attached order and memorandum of decision. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 2/18/10. (Johnson, J.)