Microsoft State Court Decisions - Company Legal Profiles

Corel Software v. Microsoft

Filed: August 31, 2018

State: Utah
Court: Utah District Court
Case Number: 2:2015cv00528

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERdenying 145 Motion for Entry of Judgment. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/31/2018. (jds)

Moussouris v. Microsoft Corporation

Filed: July 24, 2018

State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2015cv01483

STIPULATION AND ORDER sealing the 510 Order granting in part and denying in part Defendant's motion for summary judgment 403 489 as reflected in the redacted copy of the Order attached to the Parties' Stipulation 512 . Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

VIATECH TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION

Filed: May 23, 2018

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 17-2276

Holotouch, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation

Filed: May 18, 2018

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2017cv08717

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS re: 19 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6), filed by Microsoft Corporation. For the reasons stated herein, the motion to dismis s is granted in part and denied in part. Count I of the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Count II remains viable. The clerk is instructed to terminate the motion (ECF 19). The parties shall appear for a status conference on June 1,…

Raniere v. Microsoft Corp.

Filed: April 18, 2018

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 17-1400

United States v. Microsoft Corp.

Filed: April 17, 2018

State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 17-2

BAKER v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION

Filed: April 9, 2018

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 17-2357

Mantel v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filed: March 29, 2018

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2016cv05277

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. This resolves Docket Number 60. The Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is denied. This resolves Docket Number 61. The Clerk of Court is direc ted to close the case and issue judgment. SO ORDERED. re: 61 FIRST MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by John Mantel, 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Hearst Newspapers, LLC, Verizon Services Corporation , Toshiba America…

Maher v. Microsoft Corporation

Filed: March 29, 2018

State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2017cv00753

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated, Defendant Microsoft Corporation's motion to compel arbitration, ECF No. 24 , is granted, and the parties are ordered to arbitrate this dispute by following the procedure in § 15 of def endant's Master Services Agreement, ECF No. 26 -1. This action is stayed pending arbitration. The parties are directed to file a status report on the arbitration on or before June 26, 2018. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on…

Biscotti Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

Filed: March 23, 2018

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2013cv01015

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/23/2018. (ch, )

SETH BAKER V. MICROSOFT CORPORATION

Filed: January 29, 2018

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 12-35946

Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1-10

Filed: January 2, 2018

State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2017cv01911

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Expedite Discovery signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(PM)

MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. BISCOTTI, INC.

Filed: December 28, 2017

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-2080

Microsoft Corporation v. Does

Filed: December 25, 2017

State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2017cv01880

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Expedite Discovery. Nothing in this Order precludes Plaintiff from renewing its motion once it can cure the deficiencies described above. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)