Netflix State Court Decisions

Whyte Monkee Productions LLC et al v. Netflix INC

Filed: April 27, 2022

State: Oklahoma
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Case Number: 5:2020cv00933

ORDER granting 46 Defendants Netflix, Inc. and Royal GoodeProductions LLCs Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 4/27/2022. (mb)

Village of Shiloh v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Filed: March 24, 2022

State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv00807

ORDER GRANTING 45 Plaintiff, Village of Shiloh's motion to remand. This case is hereby REMANDED to the Circuit Court for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St. Clair County, Illinois. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 3/24/2022.

In Re NETFLIX, INC.

Filed: January 19, 2022

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 22-110

CA, Inc. et al v. Netflix, Inc.

Filed: November 16, 2021

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv00080

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 11/16/2021. (nkl, )

In Re NETFLIX, INC.

Filed: October 25, 2021

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 21-190

Ashdown, Arkansas, City of v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Filed: September 30, 2021

State: Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Case Number: 4:2020cv04113

ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss; granting 23 Motion to Dismiss. All claims against Defendants are dismissed. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 30, 2021. (mll)

Fairstein v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Filed: August 9, 2021

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv08042

OPINION AND ORDER: re: 94 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument. addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Natalie Spears dated February 19, 2021. filed by Netflix Inc., Ava DuVernay, Attica Locke, 86 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Notice of M otion and Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Netflix Inc., Ava DuVernay, Attica Locke. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the motion is denied as to the scenes described in p…

Gwinnett County, Georgia et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Filed: August 5, 2021

State: Georgia
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00021

OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 42 Motion to Stay; granting 11 Motion to Remand to State Court to the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, Georgia. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/5/2021. (dob)

ADAPTIVE STREAMING INC. v. NETFLIX, INC.

Filed: December 14, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1310

DAVID WHITEHEAD V. NETFLIX, INC.

Filed: December 10, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 19-55905

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.

Filed: August 25, 2020

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv03708

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 66 MOTION for Reconsideration of the claim construction of the term "intermediate transmitter station" filed by Netflix Inc. Netflix's motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. Because the ITS terms are synonyms, the Court construes the term "intermediate transmitter station to mean a station that can receive and retransmit broadcast transmissions."The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt No. 66. (As…

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.

Filed: July 28, 2020

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv03708

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 57 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Netflix, Inc.s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Regarding The 217, 344, And 528 Patents filed by Netflix Inc. PMC has plausibly alleged that the p atents challenged on this motion have inventive concepts, so Netflix's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. The Court's decision is narrow because it must accept as true the allegations in PMC's complaint. It does n ot preclude Netflix from…

Brown et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Filed: May 27, 2020

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv01507

OPINION & ORDER re: 28 MOTION to Dismiss . MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Amazon.Com, Inc., Apple Inc., Netflix, Inc.. For the reasons stated above, the Defendants' motion to dismiss and for ju dgement on the pleadings is GRANTED with prejudice. he Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 28, and to close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/27/2020) (ks) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for…

John E. Reid and Associates, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Filed: March 23, 2020

State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv06781

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 3/23/2020: Array and DuVernay's motion to dismiss, 26 , and Netflix's motion to dismiss, 23 , are granted. The dismissal of Netflix is with prejudice. The First Ame ndment precludes liability for all of Reid's substantive claims and no additional factual context is necessary to resolve that legal issue. Reid has amended the complaint once and any further amendment would be futile. See Runnion ex rel.…

DIGITAL MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES v. NETFLIX, INC.

Filed: November 13, 2018

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 17-2408

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Netflix, Inc.

Filed: March 20, 2017

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv00574

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/20/2017. (slo, )

NETFLIX, INC. v. ROVI CORPORATION

Filed: November 7, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1917

Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. Netflix Inc

Filed: September 26, 2016

State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2015cv02160

Memorandum Opinion and Order: Accordingly, the Court DENIES 10 Defendants' Motion s without prejudice to consideration of § 101 arguments in the context of a summary judgment motion, after claim construction has concluded. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/26/2016) (ndt)

ARKANSAS TEACHER RET. SYSTEM V. NETFLIX INC.

Filed: April 11, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 14-15315