CA, Inc. et al v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: November 16, 2021
State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv00080
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 11/16/2021. (nkl, )
In Re NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: October 25, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 21-190
Ashdown, Arkansas, City of v. Netflix, Inc. et al
Filed: September 30, 2021
State: Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Case Number: 4:2020cv04113
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss; granting 23 Motion to Dismiss. All claims against Defendants are dismissed. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 30, 2021. (mll)
Fairstein v. Netflix, Inc. et al
Filed: August 9, 2021
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv08042
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 94 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument. addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Natalie Spears dated February 19, 2021. filed by Netflix Inc., Ava DuVernay, Attica Locke, 86 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Notice of M otion and Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Netflix Inc., Ava DuVernay, Attica Locke. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the motion is denied as to the scenes described in p…
Gwinnett County, Georgia et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
Filed: August 5, 2021
State: Georgia
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00021
OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 42 Motion to Stay; granting 11 Motion to Remand to State Court to the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, Georgia. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/5/2021. (dob)
ADAPTIVE STREAMING INC. v. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: December 14, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1310
DAVID WHITEHEAD V. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: December 10, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 19-55905
Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: August 25, 2020
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv03708
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 66 MOTION for Reconsideration of the claim construction of the term "intermediate transmitter station" filed by Netflix Inc. Netflix's motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. Because the ITS terms are synonyms, the Court construes the term "intermediate transmitter station to mean a station that can receive and retransmit broadcast transmissions."The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt No. 66. (As…
Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: July 28, 2020
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv03708
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 57 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Netflix, Inc.s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Regarding The 217, 344, And 528 Patents filed by Netflix Inc. PMC has plausibly alleged that the p atents challenged on this motion have inventive concepts, so Netflix's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. The Court's decision is narrow because it must accept as true the allegations in PMC's complaint. It does n ot preclude Netflix from…
Brown et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
Filed: May 27, 2020
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv01507
OPINION & ORDER re: 28 MOTION to Dismiss . MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Amazon.Com, Inc., Apple Inc., Netflix, Inc.. For the reasons stated above, the Defendants' motion to dismiss and for ju dgement on the pleadings is GRANTED with prejudice. he Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 28, and to close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/27/2020) (ks) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for…
John E. Reid and Associates, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc. et al
Filed: March 23, 2020
State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv06781
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 3/23/2020: Array and DuVernay's motion to dismiss, 26 , and Netflix's motion to dismiss, 23 , are granted. The dismissal of Netflix is with prejudice. The First Ame ndment precludes liability for all of Reid's substantive claims and no additional factual context is necessary to resolve that legal issue. Reid has amended the complaint once and any further amendment would be futile. See Runnion ex rel.…
DIGITAL MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES v. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: November 13, 2018
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 17-2408
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: March 20, 2017
State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv00574
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 3/20/2017. (slo, )
NETFLIX, INC. v. ROVI CORPORATION
Filed: November 7, 2016
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1917
Convergent Media Solutions LLC v. Netflix Inc
Filed: September 26, 2016
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2015cv02160
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Accordingly, the Court DENIES 10 Defendants' Motion s without prejudice to consideration of § 101 arguments in the context of a summary judgment motion, after claim construction has concluded. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/26/2016) (ndt)
ARKANSAS TEACHER RET. SYSTEM V. NETFLIX INC.
Filed: April 11, 2016
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 14-15315
Copy Protection LLC v. Netflix Inc.
Filed: August 5, 2015
State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv00365
MEMORANDUM OPINION re claim construction. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/5/15. (ntl)
MEGHAN MOLLETT V. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: July 31, 2015
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 12-17045
Video Privacy Protection Act. The panel affirmed the dismissal of claims brought under the Video Privacy Protection Act and California Civil Code § 1799.3 against Netflix, Inc., a subscription videostreaming service. The panel held that Netflix did not violate these statutes by permitting certain disclosures about subscribers’ viewing history to third parties¯specifically subscribers’ family, friends, and guests. The panel concluded that the complained-of…
Trans Video Electronics Ltd. v. Netflix Inc.
Filed: July 7, 2015
State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2012cv01743
MEMORANDUM OPINION re claim construction. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/7/15. Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-01743-LPS, 1:13-cv-00061-LPS, 1:13-cv-01399-LPS (ntl)
DONALD CULLEN V. NETFLIX
Filed: April 1, 2015
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 13-15092