Sandisk Federal District Court Decisions

PNY Technologies, Inc. v. Sandisk Corporation

Filed: November 16, 2011 as 3:2011cv04689
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation
Plaintiff: PNY Technologies, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER continuing motion (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

PNY Technologies, Inc. v. Sandisk Corporation

Filed: November 3, 2011 as 3:2011cv04689
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation
Plaintiff: PNY Technologies, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER Providing SanDisk Until November 9, 2011, to Answer or Otherwise Plead to PNY's Complaint (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2011)

Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filed: October 27, 2011 as 5:2010cv02787
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation, Eliyahou Harari
Plaintiff: Ritz Camera & Image, LLC
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER re 84 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/26/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)

PNY Technologies, Inc. v. Sandisk Corporation

Filed: October 12, 2011 as 3:2011cv04689
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation
Plaintiff: PNY Technologies, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER granting pro hac (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)

SanDisk Corporation v. Kingston Technology Co., Inc. et al

Filed: August 12, 2011 as 3:2010cv00243
Court: Wisconsin Western District Court
Defendant: Imation Corp., Imation Enterprises Corp., Kingston Technology Co., Inc., Kingston Technology Corp., Memorex Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: SanDisk Corp.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER that the court's order on defendant's motion for summary judgment is sealed. The parties may have until August 22, 2011 in which to file materials showing why the order should not be unsealed. If the parties fail to submit any such materials or those materials prove unsatisfactory, the summary judgment order will be unsealed. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/12/2011. (voc)

Sandisk Corporation v. Mobile Media Ideas LLC

Filed: July 7, 2011 as 4:2011cv00597
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Mobile Media Ideas LLC
Plaintiff: Sandisk Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER Granting 30 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/7/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2011)

Sandisk Corporation v. Mobile Media Ideas LLC

Filed: May 27, 2011 as 4:2011cv00597
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Mobile Media Ideas LLC
Plaintiff: Sandisk Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING 28 Stipulation ORDER REGARDING RESCHEDULING OF INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 7/5/2011. Case Management Conference set for 7/12/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/27/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)

Main Hastings, LLC v. SanDisk Corporation

Filed: May 24, 2011 as 5:2011cv01508
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation
Plaintiff: Main Hastings LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RELATE CASES. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/16/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)

Sandisk Corporation v. Mobile Media Ideas LLC

Filed: May 24, 2011 as 4:2011cv00597
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Mobile Media Ideas LLC
Plaintiff: Sandisk Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)

Sandisk Corporation v. Mobile Media Ideas LLC

Filed: May 23, 2011 as 4:2011cv00597
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Mobile Media Ideas LLC
Plaintiff: Sandisk Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING DEFENDANTS 10 MOTION TO DISMISS. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2011)

Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filed: May 18, 2011 as 5:2010cv02787
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation, Eliyahou Harari
Plaintiff: Ritz Camera & Image, LLC
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER FOLLOWING DISCOVERY PLANNING CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/18/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)

Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filed: May 2, 2011 as 5:2010cv02787
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation, Eliyahou Harari
Plaintiff: Ritz Camera & Image, LLC
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 68 and 73 . The Court will hold a discovery status conference on 5/17/2011 at 1:30 p.m. during which time the parties' respective proposed electronic discovery plans will be discussed. The Court does not intend to schedule further discovery status conferences. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/2/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)

Main Hastings, LLC v. SanDisk Corporation

Filed: May 2, 2011 as 5:2011cv01508
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation
Plaintiff: Main Hastings LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 Substitution of Counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/2/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)

Oliver et al v. SD-3 LLC et al

Filed: April 6, 2011 as 3:2011cv01260
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: SD-3 LLC, Panasonic Corp., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Toshiba Corp., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Sandisk Corp.
Plaintiff: Dan Oliver, Jeannie Oliver
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/6/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2011)

SanDisk Corporation v. Kingston Technology Co., Inc. et al

Filed: March 16, 2011 as 3:2010cv00243
Court: Wisconsin Western District Court
Defendant: Imation Corp., Imation Enterprises Corp., Kingston Technology Co., Inc., Kingston Technology Corp., Memorex Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: SanDisk Corp.
Nature of Suit: Patent

Opinion and Order re: Patents. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/15/2011. (voc)

SanDisk Corp. v. Phison Electronics Corp. et al

Filed: March 11, 2011 as 3:2007cv00605
Court: Wisconsin Western District Court
Defendant: A-Data Technology (USA) Co., Ltd., A-Data Technology Co., Ltd., Acer, Inc., Apacer Memory America, Inc., Apacer Technology Inc., Behavior Tech Computer Corp., Behavior Tech Computer USA Corp., Buffalo Technology (USA) Inc., Buffalo, Inc., Dane-Elec Corp. USA, Dane-Elec Memory, S.A., Infotech Logistic LLC, Kingston Technology Co., Inc., Kingston Technology Corp., Melco Holdings, Inc., MemoSun, Inc., Payton Technology Corp., Phison Electronics Corp., PNY Technologies, Inc., Power Quotient International Co., Ltd., PQI Corp., Silicon Motion International, Inc., Silicon Motion Technology Corp., Silicon Motion, Inc. (California), Silicon Motion, Inc. (Taiwan), Skymedi Corp., Synergistic Sales, Inc., Transcend Information Inc. (California, U.S.A.), Transcend Information Inc. (Taiwan), Transcend Information Maryland, Inc., USBest Technology, Inc., Verbatim Corp. and others
Plaintiff: SanDisk Corp.
Nature of Suit: Patent

JUDGMENT entered in favor of Plaintiff SanDisk Corp. granting motion for summary judgment re Kingston Technology Co., Inc. and Kingston Technology Corp.'s defenses of lack of standing and re plaintiff's claim that defendants contributorily infringed claims 20, 24, 28 and 30 of the '424 patent; JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Kingston Technology Co., Inc. and Kingston Technology Corp. granting motion for summary judgment re plaintiff's claims that…

Sandisk Corporation v. Shea Integration Solutions Corp

Filed: March 9, 2011 as 4:2010cv03617
Court: California Northern District Court
3rd Party Plaintiff: Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Shea Integration Solutions Corp
Plaintiff: Sandisk Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/8/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2011)

Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation et al

Filed: February 24, 2011 as 5:2010cv02787
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sandisk Corporation, Eliyahou Harari
Plaintiff: Ritz Camera & Image, LLC
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION 39 TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on February 24, 2011. (jflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2011)

Sandisk Corporation v. Shea Integration Solutions Corp

Filed: February 9, 2011 as 4:2010cv03617
Court: California Northern District Court
3rd Party Plaintiff: Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Shea Integration Solutions Corp
Plaintiff: Sandisk Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/9/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2011)

Sandisk Corporation v. Shea Integration Solutions Corp

Filed: January 18, 2011 as 4:2010cv03617
Court: California Northern District Court
3rd Party Plaintiff: Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Shea Integration Solutions Corp
Plaintiff: Sandisk Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY AND ORDER: That attorney David W. Hansen for Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc. added and attorney Douglas E. Lumish; Jill Jane Ho and Jeffrey G. Homrig are terminated. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 01/18/11. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2011)