Synopsys Federal District Court Decisions

Synopsys Inc et al v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filed: January 15, 2013 as 3:2012cv05025
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Mentor Graphics Corporation
Plaintiff: Emulation and Verification Engineering S.A., Eve-USA Inc, Synopsys Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION'S MOTION 30 TO SEAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 15, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2013)

Synopsys Inc et al v. Mentor Graphics Corporation

Filed: January 4, 2013 as 3:2012cv05025
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Mentor Graphics Corporation
Plaintiff: Emulation and Verification Engineering S.A., Eve-USA Inc, Synopsys Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to February 22, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 4, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013).

Synopsys, Inc. v. Sabharwal

Filed: December 26, 2012 as 3:2012cv05334
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deepak Sabharwal
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 2/14/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/26/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2012)

Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.

Filed: December 3, 2012 as 5:2011cv05973
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Synopsys, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 124 Motion for Leave to File (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)

Synopsys, Inc. v. Sabharwal

Filed: October 19, 2012 as 3:2012cv05334
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deepak Sabharwal
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ENTRY OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, ORDER FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/18/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2012)

Synopsys, Inc. v. Sabharwal

Filed: October 18, 2012 as 3:2012cv05334
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deepak Sabharwal
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 9 FOR ENTRY OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, ORDER FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/18/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2012)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: June 7, 2012 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING DUE DATE FOR SYNOPSYS INC.'S OPPOSITION TO RICOH'S MOTION FOR STAY re 796 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Responses to Motion to Stay due by 6/11/2012. Signed by Chief Judge James Ware on June 7, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2012)

Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.

Filed: April 12, 2012 as 5:2011cv05973
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Synopsys, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

PROTECTIVE ORDER re 31 Declaration in Support, filed by Synopsys, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 12, 2012. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2012)

Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.

Filed: April 12, 2012 as 5:2011cv05973
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Synopsys, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING SYSNOPSYS, INC.'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER DENYING DYNETIX DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC.'S CROSS-MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting 29 Motion for Protective Order; denying 30 Motion for Protective Order (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2012)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: March 27, 2012 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 781 MOTION for Taxation of Costs Upon Remand filed by Synopsys, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 781 MOTION for Taxation of Costs Upon Remand. Synopsys's Replies due by 4/11/2012. Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/27/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2012)

Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.

Filed: March 13, 2012 as 5:2011cv05973
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Synopsys, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 13, 2012. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2012)

Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.

Filed: March 12, 2012 as 5:2011cv05973
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Synopsys, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING E-DISCOVERY, re 20 Joint Case Management Statement filed by Dynetix Design Solutions, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 3/12/2012. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: February 22, 2012 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR FEES Motion Hearing set for 4/23/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/22/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: March 28, 2011 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING 770 Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel of Record. Attorney Michael A. Berta terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/28/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: June 29, 2010 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Stipulation Extending Time to File Opposition to Bill of Costs re 713 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/29/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2010)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: May 28, 2010 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Ware on May 28, 2010. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2010)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: May 5, 2010 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER FINDING AS MOOT REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR THE 5/10/2010 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERNECE re 703 Notice of Appearance. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/5/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2010)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: February 10, 2010 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AS AMENDED BY THE COURT re 673 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/10/10. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2010) Modified text on 2/11/2010 (cv, COURT STAFF).

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: December 14, 2009 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

STIPULATION AND ORDER Setting Certain Pre-Trial Schedule Dates re 648 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/14/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2009)

In re Ricoh Company Ltd. Patent Litigation

Filed: October 23, 2009 as 5:2003cv02289
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc.
Defendant: Ricoh Company, Ltd
Plaintiff: Synopsys, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

REVISED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AFTER RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge James Ware on October 23, 2009. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2009)