Synopsys State Court Decisions

Synopsys, Inc. v. Bell Semiconductor, LLC

Filed: December 6, 2023

State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2022cv01512

MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/6/2023. (nmf)

Synopsys, Inc. v. Risk Based Security, Inc.

Filed: June 15, 2023

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Case Number: 22-1812

SYNOPSYS, INC. V. USDOL

Filed: May 12, 2022

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 20-16414

SYNOPSYS, INC. V. USDOL

Filed: May 12, 2022

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 20-16416

Timely Notice of Appeal / Intervenor. The panel dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction prospective intervenor Synopsys, Inc.’s untimely appeal of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of The Center for Investigative Reporting (“CIR”); and dismissed as moot CIR’s and the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”)’s cross-appeals. CIR brought a FOIA action against DOL, claiming that DOL was improperly withholding workforce…

Synopsys, Inc. v. Risk Based Security, Inc.

Filed: January 11, 2022

State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv00252

OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by Senior United States District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 1/11/2022. (sbea)

Synopsys, Inc. v. Avatar Integrated Systems, Inc.

Filed: December 22, 2020

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2020cv04151

ORDER CLARIFYING NOVEMBER 12, 2020 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO CLAIMS I AND II AND DENYING 55 MOTION AS TO CLAIM VI by Judge William H. Orrick. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2020)

Synopsys, Inc. v. Avatar Integrated Systems, Inc.

Filed: November 12, 2020

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2020cv04151

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 26 MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO CLAIMS I AND II AND DENYING MOTION AS TO CLAIM VI by Judge William H. Orrick. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2020)

Synopsys, Inc v. AzurEngine Technologies, Inc et al

Filed: August 15, 2019

State: California
Court: California Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2019cv01443

ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Expedited Discovery, and Order to Show Cause (Dkt. 4 ). Construed as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Synopsys' Motion for a Temporary Restr aining Order is granted. Dkt. 4 . Given that the Court has entered a preliminary injunction, Synopsys' request for an Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction is denied as moot. Dkt. 4 . Synopsys' Motion for Expedited…

Synopsys, Inc. v. InnoGrit, Corp.

Filed: June 26, 2019

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 5:2019cv02082

Order Granting Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/26/19. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2019)

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. ATOPTECH, INC.

Filed: May 5, 2017

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-1956

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. ATOPTECH, INC.

Filed: April 24, 2017

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-1956

Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filed: October 24, 2016

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of Decision, the Court finds in favor of Synopsys and against ATopTech on the defense of equitable estoppel. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/24/16. (mmcalc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2016)

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

Filed: October 17, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1599

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

Filed: October 11, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-2056

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. LEE

Filed: February 10, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1183

SYNOPSYS, INC. v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION

Filed: February 10, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 14-1516

Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filed: January 7, 2016

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (1) To the extent Count I, Copyright Infringement, is based on asserte d infringement of input and output formats used in unregistered versions of Synopsys's static timing analysis software programs that pre-date the registered versions of those programs, ATopTech's motion for summary judgment is granted. (2)…

Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filed: September 17, 2015

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND. Synopsys's motion for leave to file a second Amended Complaint is denied. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 17, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2015)

Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filed: September 7, 2015

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965

ORDER DENYING JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER 330 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/07/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2015)

Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc

Filed: August 7, 2015

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Synopsys' motion to dismiss and strike is granted as follows: 1. To the extent the motion seeks dismissal of Counts I, II, IV, V, and VII the motion is granted, and said counts are dismissed without leave to amend. 2. To the extent the motion seeks dismissal of Counts III, VI, and VIII, the motion is granted, and said counts are dismissed with leave to amend. 3. To the extent the motion seeks an…