SYNOPSYS, INC. v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION
Filed: February 10, 2016
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 14-1516
SYNOPSYS, INC. v. LEE
Filed: February 10, 2016
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1183
Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filed: January 7, 2016
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (1) To the extent Count I, Copyright Infringement, is based on asserte d infringement of input and output formats used in unregistered versions of Synopsys's static timing analysis software programs that pre-date the registered versions of those programs, ATopTech's motion for summary judgment is granted. (2)…
Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filed: September 17, 2015
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND. Synopsys's motion for leave to file a second Amended Complaint is denied. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 17, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2015)
Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filed: September 7, 2015
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965
ORDER DENYING JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER 330 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/07/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2015)
Synopsys, Inc. v. Atoptech, Inc
Filed: August 7, 2015
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv02965
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Synopsys' motion to dismiss and strike is granted as follows: 1. To the extent the motion seeks dismissal of Counts I, II, IV, V, and VII the motion is granted, and said counts are dismissed without leave to amend. 2. To the extent the motion seeks dismissal of Counts III, VI, and VIII, the motion is granted, and said counts are dismissed with leave to amend. 3. To the extent the motion seeks an…
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation
Filed: July 16, 2015
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2012cv06467
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES Having considered the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that neither Synopsys' litigating position, nor the manner in which the case was litigated, place the instant case within that gro up of "rare case[s]" qualifying as "exceptional." See Octane Fitness, 134 S. Ct. at 1757. Accordingly, Mentor's Motion for Attorney Fees is denied. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 16, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF)…
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation
Filed: November 19, 2014
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2012cv06467
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUBMIT STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 19, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2014)
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation
Filed: November 19, 2014
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2012cv06467
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUBMIT STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 19, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2014)
Synopsys, Inc. v. Lee et al
Filed: October 9, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Case Number: 1:2014cv00674
MEMORANDUM OPINION re Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 10/9/14. (klau, )
